Links and Resources
The following references to web sites, renewal groups and other
resources are for informational and research purposes only and do not
necessarily constitute an endorsement of the full content of the resource.
Links directly related to Bishop Sprague’s writings, the complaint,
dismissal and responses:
-
"The
Message of Jesus Enrages the People",
Rev. Scott Shreve, Feb. 1, 2004,
St. Luke United Methodist Church
Last week Bishop Sprague provided a message that brought
forth a variety of responses from the congregation. Some were deeply
appreciative of what he said and how he said it, while others were
shocked, appalled and offended by his message. There are copies of
his sermon at the literature racks by the entrances if you were not
present and would like to read the sermon that ignited such a wide
range of reactions. Bishop Sprague addressed the major issues that
our denominational representatives will be working through at the
General Conference this Spring. The three issues he identified were
as follows.
First, the potential cutbacks on funding for the work that our
Church is doing with children and the poor throughout the world as
the denomination is experiencing some financial challenges. He
advocates that we need to find cuts in the budget elsewhere. That
did not bring forth a reaction in one way or another.
The second issue he raised was the level of inclusiveness that the
United Methodist Church chooses to maintain. Within this context he
specifically addressed how gays and lesbians are included or
excluded from the life of the church. Our denomination's current
stance on homosexuality reads as follows:
Homosexual persons no less than heterosexual persons are individuals
of sacred worth. All persons need the ministry and guidance of the
church in their struggles for human fulfillment, as well as the
spiritual and emotional care of a fellowship that enables
reconciling relationships with God, with others, and with self.
Although we do not condone the practice of homosexuality and
consider the practice incompatible with Christian teaching, we
affirm that God's grace is available to all. We implore families and
churches not to reject or condemn their lesbian and gays members and
friends. We commit ourselves to be in ministry for and with all
persons.
The phrase in that passage that gets great attention at each General
Conference every four years is, "Although we do not condone the
practice of homosexuality and consider the practice incompatible
with Christian teaching..." The question is, should that phrase be
reaffirmed or changed?
Bishop Sprague is a strong proponent for full inclusion of gays and
lesbians in the life of the church. He framed this within the
context of biblical understanding as well as a historical reference
to groups of people that have been excluded from the church in the
past. If you were not present, you now know one of the issues that
brought about a variety of reactions.
Lastly, the third issue he lifted up was the need, from his
perspective, for the United Methodist Church to clarify its stance
on war. Is our denominational stance pacifist, just war, just peace,
or crusade war? To illustrate his point he made specific reference
to the U.S. action in Iraq and he went on and clearly stated that
the manner of the U.S. attack and present occupation of Iraq was and
is wrong. Once again, if you were not present, you now know another
of the issues that resulted in a variety of reactions.
Read More and
also
Pastoral Ponderings
-
Agape Press: Top Stories of 2003: Methodist Committee
Tosses Out Charges Against Chicago Bishop,
December 22, 2003 (originally published February 19, 2003)
(AgapePress) - A committee of United
Methodist Church (UMC) bishops has dismissed charges against a fellow
bishop who denies the basic biblical teachings about Jesus Christ.
Many United Methodist members have expressed outrage over statements
made by Bishop Joseph Sprague of Chicago. They say he has denied the
virgin birth, the physical resurrection of Jesus Christ, and that
faith in Jesus Christ is the only way of salvation.
Read More
-
Bishop Joseph C. Sprague’s Sermon at Northern Illinois Conference
Special Session, Saturday, November 23, 2002
-
The Bishop Who Denied the Virgin Birth - Chicago Sun Times,
November 20, 2003
Bishop Sprague's Speech & Chapter 4: "Fully
Human Jesus", from Affirmations of a Dissenter
Affirmations of a Dissenter by C. Joseph Sprague
Discussion Guide and Recommended Reading
Affirmations of a Dissenter (Abingdon Press, 2002) offers a
composite of affirmation and dissent on the work and mission of the
church today and challenges readers to maintain their faith and hope
while working within the church for congregational renewal. As
bishop of the Chicago area, Northern Illinois Conference of The
United Methodist Church, C. Joseph Sprague shares his insights and
suggestions on such issues as racism, church leadership, world
peace, homosexuality, and biblical authority. He calls Christians to
become one with Christ and each other by living their faith and
making a difference in the world. You may not always agree with him
as you read this book, but Bishop Sprague succeeds in making you
think about what you believe and why you believe it. Read
More
Other
Bishop's Responses
News
Releases
Laity Voice - Newsletter of the Methodist Laity Reform Movement
(Iowa Conference), June 2003
Bishop Sprague
Rejects Key Christian Beliefs But Is Not Held Accountable
United Methodist
Bishop Joseph C. Sprague of
Chicago has publicly rejected
Jesus Christ’s eternal
deity, virgin
birth, bodily resurrection, and atonement for the sins of the
world. He denied that Jesus is the only way to salvation, and
said the Gospel of John is not true. Sprague made his attack on
the Christian faith in a
January 28, 2002 speech at
United Methodist Iliff School of Theology in Denver and again in
a book,
both entitled “Affirmations of a Dissenter.” The
full text of his speech is at
www.ird-renew.org/umaction. Sprague is still drawing a
salary as a United Methodist Bishop. A complaint filed by 28
United Methodists charged him with violating the Book of
Discipline
by disseminating doctrines
contrary to
established United Methodist doctrine and by
disobedience to the order and discipline of the church. The
complaint was dismissed.
Methodist Laity Reform Movement
defends
Sprague’s
constitutional right to believe and advocate whatever he
chooses. But it is dishonest to hold the office and receive the
pay of a United Methodist Bishop while attacking the traditional
Christian faith of John Wesley and his church. Decency and
integrity require Sprague’s resignation or removal. Will the
2004 General Conference take action to restore faithfulness and
accountability in The United
Methodist Church? The future of
this great church is
in grave
danger. Read
More
Our Church in Wonderland? Or in Orwell’s
1984?
Do words
still have meaning in The United Methodist Church? Consider:
Book of Discipline,
par. 404.1: “As followers of Jesus Christ called to servant
leadership, bishops are authorized to guard the faith, order,
liturgy, doctrine,
and discipline of the church.”
Jesus Christ:
“I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the
Father except through me.” (John 14:6, NIV)
Bishop C. Joseph Sprague:
“I must dissent from Christocentric exclusives which hold that
Jesus is the only way to God’s gift of salvation.” (Speech at
Iliff
Seminary 1-28-02)
Articles of Religion
of the UMC: “Christ did
truly rise again from the dead, and took again his body....”
(Article III)
Sprague:
“I believe in the resurrection of Jesus, but I cannot believe
that his resurrection involved the resuscitation of his physical
body.” (Speech 1-28-02)
Articles of Religion
of the UMC: “The Son, who
is the Word of the Father, the very and eternal God, of one
substance with the Father, took man’s nature in
the womb of the blessed Virgin;
...” (Article II)
Sprague:
“The myth of the virgin birth was not intended as historical
fact.... “ (Speech 1-28-02)
Book of Discipline,
Doctrinal Standards, par. 101: “We share with many Christian
communions a recognition of the authority of Scripture in
matters of
faith ...”
Sprague:
“I have chosen here not to deal with John’s account of the
gospel ... Jesus simply did not preach, teach, or describe
himself as John suggests...
if Jesus did not possess
trans-human, supernatural powers (as I do not believe he did)
what sense can we make of the miraculous stories about him in
the
gospel accounts?” (Speech
1-28-02)
Sprague:
“I can affirm my faith through the symbolic language, the
theological poetic utterances of the ancient creeds, but it is
incumbent upon me as
believer and evangelist to
unpack this ancient, obtuse language about Jesus in order to
make a semblance of finite sense out of infinite mystery on
behalf of those who find the ancient creedal language confusing
or implausible.” (Speech 1-28-02)
What does all this mean? In The
United Methodist Church, a Bishop can and does reject basic
Christian and UM beliefs — and is NOT held
accountable. The great words
remain, but they mean anything or nothing — whatever meaning
is chosen by anyone who “unpacks” or “makes sense out of” the
faith given to us by the Bible and the apostles.
Read More
Other Pastor's Responses
Commentaries by Rev. Ray Rooney,
Pastor Verona-Palmetto United Methodist Charge, P.O. Box 370. Verona, MS
38879
Is there room?, July, 2002
...They have gotten their place and more. They
now run all of our seminaries. Marcus Borg is a featured and sought after
speaker in Methodist seminaries. Borg refutes nearly everything the Bible
establishes about Jesus. His deity. His virgin birth. His miracles and His
resurrection. They have been appointed to nearly all of the high level
positions on our General Boards, Committees, and Agencies which means
hordes of laypersons’ monies are being used to support things and
organizations which evangelicals find both offensive and intolerable (as
in the National Council of Churches). They have also pushed for and seen
the election of many Bishops who refuse to even embrace and uphold basic
Christian doctrine much less United Methodist and Wesleyan beliefs. Bishop
Sharon Brown Christopher is now the president of the Council of Bishops.
Bishop Christopher was an early supporter of the Re-imagining movement
from the early nineties which was nothing but goddess worship. Then there
is Bishop Melvin G. Talbert who “has encouraged missionaries to minimize
the importance of converting people to Christ and instead ‘focus on what
it means to live with others in peace.’”[1] And we sure do not want to
forget Bishop Sprague who has said of the bodily resurrection of Jesus
that is “the kind of idolatry from which I dissent” and whose favorite
theologians are John Shelby Spong and Marcus Borg[2].
Read More
Where is the Integrity?, August 21, 2002
The issues that Bishop Sprague assails are
simply too numerous for this commentary. They range from a
repudiation of John’s gospel as an accurate account of Christ’s ministry
(“Jesus simply did not preach, teach, or describe himself as John
suggests”) to his rejection of the shed blood of Christ as being essential
for salvation (“The concept of blood sacrifice is superstition at best and
an idolatrous allegiance to a non-Jesus methodology of God-human
relationship at worst.”). Commentaries could be written on those
matters themselves. However, I would like to focus on three specific
issues the bishop raises because as I read The Discipline any of
these are chargeable offenses suggesting just cause in removing the bishop
from his esteemed and honored office.
Read More
A Plea for Courage, October, 2002
But if Bishop Sprague’s speech does not strike at the root of Christianity
then Christianity has no roots. If the leadership of the United
Methodist Church cannot muster the courage to publicly denounce the speech
and reprimand the Bishop then we have no kind of Biblical or spiritual
leadership. Contrary to what some are saying in positions of
authority in Methodism, Bishop Sprague’s “affirmations” are not merely
off-the-wall opinions. They are not simply his personal opinions
about the Church and politics or the Church and social justice issues or
his own views concerning homosexuality or abortion. His
“affirmations” are not about important but peripheral issues concerning
the Church and society. If they were we would be obligated by John
Wesley’s own words to permit the Bishop to do his own thinking (aloud).
No, he repudiates and attacks the fundamental and core issues of
Christianity. He says, “Jesus was not born the Christ…” and calls
His divinity “derived, given as a gift.” He calls the belief in the
physical resurrection of Christ “the kind of idolatry from which I
dissent.” If those two statements are not heretical then there is no
such thing as heresy.
Read More
An Open Letter to all UM Bishops, November, 2002
Bishops right now we need your leadership.
More than that we need accountability. Many of you do not mind
stepping to the forefront of politics and social justice issues. We
have head you chastise the current Administration for its commitment to
the war on Terror and the ultimatum to Iraq. We have seen some of
you step front and center into the limelight to promote toleration and
acceptance of homosexuality. Tell me, what is more important than
letting your members know where you stand concerning basic Christian
doctrine? How many of you besides Bishops Sprague and McCleskey call
belief in the Virgin Birth and Resurrection as understood and professed by
some of the most prominent Christian thinkers of all time and for
thousands of years “extreme views”? How many of you believe
evangelical Methodists are the “thought police”? How many of you
honestly believe that the complaints against Bishop Sprague are “part of
an organized effort of a small, very vocal minority”?
How many of you are
willing to admit that there is a crisis of confidence in the Episcopacy?
Are you going to pretend it does not exist? Are you going to
continue to insult conservative Methodists saying that they are of “no
consequence.”? Why do we know that you oppose the war on Iraq but
are left to wonder which of you believes in the atoning blood of Christ?
No longer is it assumed. You can thank Bishops Sprague and McCleskey
for that.
Read More
On Senator Lott, Bishop Sprague, and the Virgin Birth, December,
If Christian leaders
cared as much about the Church as political leaders care about Washington
then Bishop Sprague would be out (as a leader) in less than a month too.
The double standard is both glaring and shameful. Senator Lott’s
comments were made off-the-cuff at a birthday party. Bishop
Sprague’s were prepared in advance with intent and forethought at a Church
related institution for higher learning. Senator Lott offered
apologies galore for his remarks. Bishop Sprague says he has nothing
to apologize for. Senator Lott resigned his leadership post in the
Senate because the furor surrounding his comments threatened to undermine
the legitimacy and work of his political party. Bishop Sprague
seemingly could care less about the damage he is doing to the United
Methodist denomination and has responded to calls for his resignation by
telling one of his critics he “can follow a secular program if he so
chooses…” (is that not the same as saying he can go to hell? I guess
the Bishop forgot about loving one’s enemies and praying for those who
persecute you). It is truly embarrassing when those in the secular
world have to demonstrate to those in the Church how something should be
done and yet have to endure the religious one stubbornly refuse. It
smacks of Phariseeism (elitism).
Read More
Alexander and Joseph, January 31, 2003
There are three basic reasons why I
believe Bishop C. Joseph Sprague should either be forced to recant his
heresies publicly or surrender his credentials as an Elder in the United
Methodist Church (which would automatically make him ineligible to retain
the office of Bishop). First, Joseph the Bishop should recant or be
forced out because his public Christological statements and his subsequent
defenses of them are both heretical and incoherent. For instance,
the Bishop has said point blank that he does not affirm a physically
Resurrected Jesus. The concept of the atoning blood he has called
“superstition at best.” And his Christology (“from below”) proclaims
Christ’s divinity “as resulting [emphasis mine] from a radical
trust relationship” with God (from “Theological Integrity” posted on the
Bishop’s web-site). In other words Jesus was not God incarnate from the
beginning. No, he became divine when He attained a certain
level of trust in God. But it gets far worse than that. Read
More
Dear Mr. President February 13, 2003
Please keep in
mind, Mr. President, that neither this Bishop nor any other in the United
Methodist Church has stated publicly that she/they believe that Bishop C.
Joseph Sprague (Northern Illinois Conference) is guilty of heresy for
publicly repudiating the Virgin Birth, the Resurrection, or the blood
atonement of Jesus Christ. Apparently, it is just fine to call
anyone other than a Bishop a heretic because not one Bishop has publicly
called what Bishop Sprague espouses as heresy. This kind of
hypocrisy is blatant and dishonorable.
Read More
Show Me the Way, March 11, 2003
On February 18, 2003 The United
Methodist News Service sent out a press release concerning the dismissal
of complaints brought against United Methodist Bishop C. Joseph Sprague.
The
press release
contained a news article about the situation and responses by both the
Supervisory Response Team which reviewed (and dismissed) the complaints
and Bishop Sprague. I intentionally refrained from writing about the
situation for a couple of weeks in order to gain perspective and prevent a
purely reactionary emotive response.
Although a couple of weeks has abated
the anger, I still find myself amazed at the arrogance and confounded by
the logic of the published responses of Bishops Ough (writing for the
Supervisory Response Team) and Sprague. It is flabbergasting to say
the least that Bishop Ough recognizes "The entire Church is watching" and
yet begins his team's response by acknowledging they are knowingly and
intentionally violating procedure as mandated by The Discipline.
Following a brief review of the facts concerning the complaints of heresy
brought against Bishop Sprague, Bishop Ough writes, "The Book of
Discipline 2000 calls for the supervisory response process to be carried
out in a confidential manner. However, in this case the supervisory
response is being made public…" Why? "First, and foremost, was the
decision by the group of complainants to publicly disclose their
complaint." Are we to understand that a team of Bishops (and one lay
person) has rationalized violating the rules of The Discipline because
'they did it first'? Is this the message Bishop Ough and his team
are communicating to the entire watching Church? Astonishing.Read
More
Ripe for Revolution, April 13, 2003
From that point until now the gloves have
come off and there has been an all out assault against evangelical
Methodists. It is hard to believe that our church leaders would have
adopted such an in-your-face contentious and divisive stratagem, but they
have. Bishop Sprague continues to be defended and protected by his
peers against complaints of heresy. They will not even allow for a
church trial. Rather, the group that investigated the most recent
complaints not only dismissed them altogether but demanded an apology from
the complainants. Since that time Sprague has been arrested again in
an anti-war rally and
gone on record
stating that Muslims worship the same God as born-again Christians.
Read More
On Police Chases & Progressives, May 12, 2003
So how should I feel about those I am convinced are
attempting to reduce the great historic doctrines of the Church to the
equivalent of religious Aesop’s fables? I am quite aware of the
anger that burns in me whenever I read the latest from Bishop Sprague or
Mr. Jim Winkler or any number of other pseudo-intellectual Church
leaders/authorities. It used to worry me because I realize that the
Enemy of God wins when burning anger morphs into subtle hatred.
Righteous indignation is only a short step away from hatred. God
never takes that short step but the rest of us can do so without realizing
it quite easily. Hatred instantly transforms well-meaning Christians
into murderers and liars who do not know God (1 John 3:15 & 4:20).
No one is worth severing a relationship with God over. Refuse to
hate.
On the other hand neither do I
want to become unconcerned or impassionate about blatant heresies being
promoted by those who have been entrusted with the sacred honor of being
Church leaders. I had been seeking God of late concerning how I feel
about Sprague, et al. Should I just cool it for my sake and my
family’s? Let others deal with it? Embrace their teaching and
theology? Read
More
Losing
Faith, June 12, 2003
Conviction of sin. That is the real key to
renewal and revival. In John 16:8 Jesus promised the arrival of the
Holy Spirit. He said the Spirit would “reprove [convince] the world
of sin…because they believe not on me…” The Apostle Paul prophesied
that there would be a great falling away from the faith prior to the
unveiling of the anti-christ. You cannot force a renewal if in fact
it is time for an apostasy. But you can (and should) shout for all
to hear that darkness and sin are coming upon us. If there seems to
be a massive response of righteous indignation and broken hearts about
where we are going then the Spirit of God is at work and the time is ripe
for revival. But if most people remain apathetic about sin in their
midst renewal is only a dream.
Read
More
Through the Looking Glass, July 11, 2003
...Squint your eyes for a few moments and peer
through the looking glass to see what dark shapes emerge as we look into
the United Methodist Church if liberals/progressives ...were to have their
way....There are changes in the local churches as well. All
Methodist churches are required to have The Joseph Sprague Edition of the
Bible in each pew. Rather than describe what it does have it would
be easier to describe it by what it does not have. All references to
God’s judgment are missing. No references of original or personal
sin are to be found; only those references to sin which elucidate
economic, class, and social indifference and injustice are in this special
edition of the Bible. No Pauline literature is found in the New
Testament and the Gospels only include what the Jesus Seminar scholars
have deemed to be “likely” sayings of Christ (which, of course, is less
than a page). The center column is not a reference to similar
passages in other places of the Bible but are references to similar
sayings in the Koran and other religious writings demonstrating the
similarities between Jesus, Mohammed, Confucius, and others. The
clergy understand that there can be distasteful consequences for using any
other version of the Bible from the pulpit.
Read More
Politicing Holiness, August 7, 2003
Besmirching the blood atonement of
Jesus Christ is unholy. Saying He did not truly rise from the dead
is unholy. Allowing the one who made such claims to continue as a
bishop in the Church is unholy. Defending the apostate by saying he
is a nice man who has done much for social justice causes despite his
heresy is unholy. Remaining silent as church leaders is unholy.
Responding to a survey prompted by the bishop’s open apostasy which only
asked for a yes or no response to a question about Jesus and salvation
with hostility and antagonism is unholy. Equating political lobbying
to personal holiness is unholy. Calling homosexuality anything other
than sin is unholy. Advocating abortion as a right is unholy.
Threatening ministers and churches whose Christian consciences will not
allow them to continue blindly funding unholy, unrepentant, and
unresponsive bishops and boards and agencies with any kind of retribution
is unholy.
Read More
The
Last Word, August 29, 2003
In the United Methodist
Church we did not read in our Conference periodicals one day to discover
that overnight our seminaries had sold out to political correctness, our
theologians and scholars had decided that the Bible did not really mean what
it says about human sexuality, and our Bishops no longer believed that Jesus
truly and literally rose from the dead! No, we have spent quite some
time sticking our heads in the proverbial sand saying that it is better
(practically, morally, and spiritually) to speak about good things than it
is to expose and wrestle with sin in our midst (we did not want to offend
Jezebel and her supporters). We decided to affirm our children’s
grooming habits and ignore where they were going, who they were going with,
and how late they were staying out. Affirmation seemed so much better
than chastisement.
Read
More
The
New Creed, September, 24, 2003
“[W]e United Methodists are
neither a creedal nor a confessional Church. Employing Scripture,
tradition, experience, and reason conjointly, we engage in ‘holy
conferencing.’ In the company of one another we search together for the
will of God and Christ’s truth in each generation” (Bishop Joseph Sprague
of the Northern Illinois Conference from his State of the Church
address delivered June 5, 2003 at the Northern Illinois Annual
Conference).
Do you remember in time past
when a person was said not to have any “scruples?” It meant that a
person had no standards, no conscience, and no code of ethics or system of
values to adhere to. A person with no scruples did as he or she
pleased without guilt, shame, or regret. It meant that there were no
boundaries to stray beyond or rules to break. Hence, there were no
consequences to pay, no guilty conscience to assuage, and no justice to
satisfy.
Unfortunately, that is a fitting description of
the leadership of the United Methodist Church. Our leaders have no
scruples. The quotes from the three Bishops above indicate that the
United Methodist Church is becoming a Church without a conscience.
If we take their statements at face value we have no standards to guide
us, no responsibility to compel us, and absolutely no leadership to
inspire us. Bishop McCleskey wants to do away with the concept that
any theological interpretation is “right.” Bishop Christopher scoffs
at the idea that ideology has life or death ramifications and Bishop
Sprague seems to believe that God’s will and truth change generationally.
Read More
Untitled Lamentation, October 29, 2003
We have an obligation to expose heresy and de-cloak
apostasy. Ephesians 5:11 says not only should we refuse to
“participate in the unfruitful deeds of darkness, but instead even expose
them.” In writing an encouraging letter to his friend Gaius, John
mentions one “Diotrephes” as a source of grief and strife in the Church.
He writes his friend, “I will call attention to his deeds…” (3 John 10).
Defending the faith by exposing heresy and thwarting apostasy is both
necessary and scriptural. However, as Jude puts it, the Lord Himself
shall come “to execute judgment upon all, and to convict all the ungodly
of all their ungodly deeds which they have done in an ungodly way…” (Jude
14-15). Exposing heresy is an authentic calling of God for the
Church. Punishing heretics is reserved solely for God alone.
Read More
One Last Time, December 10, 2003
Over the past several years I have written over 90
commentaries. The majority of them have been about serious doctrinal and
practical controversies and problems within my own denomination (United
Methodist). I have written “An Open Letter to All United Methodist
Bishops,” addressed some serious apportionment issues, and repeatedly
pointed out the hypocrisy concerning Bishop Joseph Sprague. I could not
begin to tell you how many e-mails, letters, and phone calls I have gotten
from all over the world expressing appreciation for my “go get ‘em!”
attitude. But when I write one commentary suggesting that there is an air
of unkindness and vindictiveness which is beginning to surface in the
“renewal movement” at large you would think that I had written that the
renewal movement and everyone connected with it is the spawn of Satan.
Read More
Analysis of Affirmations of a Dissenter
Complaints dismissed against Bishop Joseph Sprague
News Releases/Articles - Dismissal
Complainants
Response to Dismissal
Survey of United Methodist Bishops,
including Bishop Sprague:
"Is Jesus the Only
Way to Salvation?"
and Related News Articles
Bishop Sprague’s Lecture at Methodist
Theological Seminary, April 22-23, 2003 and Related News Articles
Christmas
affirms Who and Why of revelation of Christ,
by Bishop C. Joseph Sprague in the December 26, 2003 issue of the
Northern Illinois Conference Edition of the United Methodist
Reporter.
"...Long ago, to make sense of the Who
and Why, it became necessary for me to set aside the notion of a God
who would and did occasionally intervene supernaturally into the
affairs of humankind. I came to believe, in part because of the
reality of evil in the world and the unfairness of life itself for
some people, e.g., racism, war, the holocaust, pogroms, slavery,
oppression, abuse, addiction, the deaths of children and the reality
that some children are born with golden spoons while most have no
spoons at all, etc., that, if God could and did literally intervene
sometimes, as in a virginal conception, but not at other times in
situations of dire need and unjust circumstances, such a god would
have far more for which to atone than you or I. Impregnate a virgin,
but not feed a starving child? Makes no sense to me. I cannot accept
that the gracious God revealed supremely in Jesus behaves this way
..."
Read More
Links to various Bulletin Boards and Web Sites for
Dialog (Official and Unofficial)
Official
UM Dialogue Website
NIC (Northern
Illinois Conference) VOICE - Resources for Education and Dialog
UMR Leads
United Methodist Church in Discussion
TheMethodistChurch Bulletin Board
UCMPage.org
Bulletin Board
Discussion Forum For Faithful Christian Laity (Led by Pacific Northwest
Annual Conference Laity)
UMC Doctrine & Polity
(UMC Web Site)
Links to information about UMC
polity and doctrine:
Official
UMC Sites/Pages
-
What kind of authority does Scripture
have?
-
How do we interpret Scripture?
-
How does the interpretation affect our
understanding of authority?
-
How do we experience the power of
Scripture in our lives?
In the conclusion, it is noted that, "...we are
convinced that we experience a divided church in crises, with vastly
different, yet deeply held commitments."
·
UMC General Conference 2004 Pittsburgh, PAhttp://umc.org/gc2004/
(General Conference 2004)
·
http://gbgm-umc.org/connections/ (this links to most of the other links
listed in this section below)
·
http://www.umc.org/index.asp (web site of the United Methodist Church)
·http://www.umc.org/churchlibrary/discipline/doctrinalstandards/
doctrinal_standards.htm
(UM Doctrinal Standards & General Rules)
· http://www.umc.org/abouttheumc/beliefs/ (UM
Beliefs)
·
http://www.umc.org/abouttheumc/organization/ (UM Organization and
Structure)
·
http://www.umc.org/abouttheumc/policy/ (UM Social Policies)
·
http://www.umc.org/churchlibrary/discipline/doctrinalstandards/
doctrinal_heritage.htm (UM Doctrinal Heritage)
·
http://www.umc.org/churchlibrary/discipline/doctrinalstandards/
theological_task.htm (UM Our Theological Task)
·
http://infoserv.umc.org/ (UM Questions and Answers)
Wesley’s
Sermons (UMC Web Site)
United Methodist Key Information
This link provides you with links to an array of
information, including Boards and
Agencies, Churches, Conferences, Jurisdictions, Other Links, United
Methodist News and Resources,
United
Methodist History, Theology and Doctrine,
Ecumenical
Connections
UMC News

"Interpreter
is the official magazine for
United Methodist laity and clergy who are actively involved in their
local churches. It is published eight (8) times a year. For 44 years,
Interpreter has been the vehicle through which local churches
share ideas and learn about the church's national and international
programs and ministries."
Christian
Social Action magazine includes
information on and analysis of social issues from the perspective of the
Christian faith and the positions of the United Methodist Church on
social issues.
Our Northern
Illinois Conference News and Events
Renewal
Groups
Links to Renewal Groups and Organizations:
-

For United Methodists
The
Mission Society for United Methodists
is a
501c(3) non-profit organization supported entirely by the
financial contributions of individuals and local
churches. Your tax deductible gift to the Mission Society
helps to support both projects and the recruiting, training
and nurturing of missionaries who have
answered the command of Jesus in Mark 16:15, "Go into all
the world and proclaim the Good News to the whole creation."
What
is the Transforming Congregations Movement?
The Transforming Congregations program helps churches
adopt a redemptive and pro-active response to the homosexual issues
of our day. It is a way for a local congregation both to stand
against the trend to accept homosexuality as normal, and make
themselves available to directly assist overcomers in the midst of
their healing and change process.
-

Catalyst
On-line
Catalyst is a project of
A
Foundation for Theological Education (AFTE).
AFTE has a longstanding interest in theological education and renewal, and is
best known for providing fellowships for UM postgraduate students.
United
Methodist (UM) seminarians have been receiving Catalyst in their mail
boxes since 1973. Since then our aims have remained constant:
- to alert seminarians to
significant resources within the classical Christian tradition;
- to highlight evangelical
perspectives on Christian faith and practice;
- to stimulate serious
consideration of classical Christianity; and
- to encourage a seminary experience fully
within the Wesleyan tradition of uniting the two so long divided,
knowledge and vital piety
UMC Related "Progressive"
Groups
Links to
"Progressive" Groups and Organization
CWC
was organized in February 2002 as a grass roots response to actions of
The United Methodist Church that many United Methodists feel are at
variance with a church that claims include all persons, yet violates its
word by rejection of homosexual, bisexual and transgender persons who
have been called by God into church leadership and ordained ministry. It
is a Cooperative Ministry with the Reconciling Ministries Network. CWC
understands "church" in its authentic form as being inclusive and
embracing of the many gifts of persons regardless of their race, gender,
economic/cultural/class status, national origin or sexual orientation.
The
CWC "Movement" is organized around a statement that refuses to declare
if the group wants to leave or stay within the UMC. Its mission is: “To
BE church in a fully inclusive way.” The group’s plan of action is: “We
commit ourselves as disciples of Jesus Christ to full inclusion of all
persons without regard to status or economic condition and celebrating
race, color, national origin, sexual orientation and gender identities.”
Read
More

"Soulforce
is an interfaith movement committed to ending spiritual violence
perpetuated by religious policies and teachings against gay, lesbian,
bisexual, and transgender (GLBT) people."
The purpose of the Denominational/Faith
Group Teams and Televangelist Teams is to keep Soulforce
leadership informed about the state of the denomination or
televangelist's attitude about GLBT people, and secondly give insights
and suggestions about the need for negotiation and/or direct action.
Methodist Federation for
Social Action (MFSA) of Northern Illinois
"Methodist Federation for Social Action (MFSA) is a national
organization seeking God's justice throughout The United Methodist
Church and the world. The local chapter of Northern Illinois is a group
of committed lay and clergy persons seeking God's reign in all we do."
Methodist Federation for Social Action
"MFSA works primarily through the ministries
of the United Methodist Church, supporting and augmenting peace and
justice ministries at the local, conference, and national levels. As an
independent organization, we call our church to expand its understanding
of the radical call of the Gospel to be the
inclusive, justice-seeking, risk-taking
Body of Christ."
(UMC) Bishop Talbert Assails IRD, UM Action (Speech
at MFSA luncheon, June 2003, Lakeside, OH)
Reconciling Ministries Network
(Witness Our Welcome) WOW2003 Home Page
WOW 2000
Sponsors (Including Northern Illinois Conference)
Affirmation United Methodists for
Gay, Lesbians and Bisexual Concerns
Links Related to "Covenant Services" in the United Methodist Church
Progressive Christian Resources:
This
links to a listing of theology books, magazines and other resources
related to “Progressive” Christianity.
This section provides links to various
resources for understanding "Progressive" Christianity. A
description of "Progressive" Christianity was offered in a
recent article,
"What
is the Core of Progressive Christianity", in the
March 2004 newsletter of the
The Center For Progressive
Christianity:Progressive Christians proclaim that
God loves everyone without exception. We struggle, like everyone
else, to affirm this dogma in everyday life. When we radically
disagree with someone or simply dislike someone, we act badly. We
get righteous, we belittle, and we make people feel unwelcome. But
because we believe in God’s universal love for all people, we try to
recognize the humanity in all of creation. In everything we do, we
try to behave as if everyone is loved by God. Everything else we do emits from
this core. Progressive Christians hold to the value of faith
community where Jesus and the Bible matter. We will never try
to define exactly what constitutes a faith community or the details
of how people engage Jesus or the Bible, but we believe no one
should be forced to develop faith on his or her own. We believe in
questions, in ambiguity, and in creating environments where doubters
and assured believers can engage in the same community. In the end,
even if we disagree on these points, and we will, we believe that
the way we treat each other is more important that the ideas we hold
true.
Read More
The
mission of The
Center for Progressive Christianity is:
»
To reach out
to those for whom organized religion has proved ineffectual,
irrelevant, or repressive, as well as to those who have given up
on or are unacquainted with it.
»
To uphold evangelism
as an agent of justice and peace.
»
To give a strong voice
both in the churches and the public arena to the advocates of
progressive Christianity .
»
To support those who embrace the search,
not certainty.

Sojourners,
www.sojo.net,
is a Christian ministry whose mission is to proclaim and practice
the biblical call to integrate spiritual renewal and social justice.
In response to this call, we offer a
vision for faith
in public life by:
- publishing
Sojourners magazine,
SojoMail
and other
resources
that address issues of faith, politics, and culture from a
biblical perspective;
- preaching, teaching, organizing,
and public witness;
- nurturing community by
bringing together
people from the various traditions and streams of the church;
- hosting an annual
program of voluntary service
for education, ministry, and discipleship.
In our lives and in our work, we seek
to be guided by the biblical principles of justice, mercy, and
humility.

Welcome: For over 100 years the
Christian Century has published articles by the most respected
theologians, historians and church leaders and has been recognized
for its concern for relating faith to political, cultural and social
issues. Readers of the Century are kept informed of the events that
are defining religious life today. The influence of religion in
public life, the theological direction of mainline churches, and the
everyday struggles of Christians to live out the gospel are explored
each week

We are a multi-faith e-community designed to help you meet your
own religious and spiritual needs -- in an interesting, captivating
and engaging way.
We are independent. We are not affiliated with a particular
religion or spiritual movement. We are not out to convert you to a
particular approach, but rather to help you find your own.
Fundamental to our mission is a deep respect for a wide variety of
faiths and traditions.
Want to learn about the teaching and
practice of Progressive Christianity? Respectful questions are
welcome here, and Progressive Christian members of Beliefnet will
help you answer them.
Learn About Progressive Christianity

This is a large religious web site;
it contains 2,460 essays and menus. But it is different from almost
all others:
 |
We do not promote our own
religious beliefs. We try to explain the full diversity of
religions in North America, from
Asatru
to
Christianity
to
Zoroastrianism. |
 |
We report on controversial religious topics, from
abortion access
to equal rights and protections for
homosexuals and bisexuals
including
same-sex marriage
(our most popular topic). We try to explain all sides to
each topic fairly and objectively.
PROGRESSIVE CHRISTIANITY
- Overview
- What kind of people are
attracted to Progressive Christianity
- The Center for
Progressive Christianity 8 Points
- Books
- Publications
- References
- Network
|
Comparison of “Conservative” and “Liberal” Christianity by Religious Tolerance
–
This links to a comparison
from a “progressive” viewpoint.
Resources for Spiritual Renewal:
The ministry of Wesley Putnam is hard
to define. It's a lot of music, a dash of drama and children´s outreach, a
sprinkling of lively, relevant preaching. It's a fresh approach to renewal
that Wes calls "Dayspring," a word that |