About Us A Bit of History Watershed Moment Presentation News & Newsletters Methodism@Risk
Biblical Mandate Point of
No Return
Conference Reports GC2004 JC2004 AC2004 2003 Northern Illinois Annual Conference
Report & Analysis
Items & Issues
of Concern in the UMC
 

Doctrinal Issues Comparison Chart

Home

Doctrinal Issues Comparison Chart
<<Word Document>>


From the Response Team’s Dismissal of Charges:

The complaints … against Bishop Sprague are a very serious matter, both for Bishop Sprague and the Church. Indeed, the supervisory response team recognizes this as a potential watershed moment in our denomination. The response to the complaints could establish the cultural ethos and the missional direction of the denomination (particularly in the United States) for the foreseeable future. The entire Church is watching. Critical questions hang in the balance and frame the context of the complaints.

Watershed Moment

It is important that we not allow the passing of what Bishop Ough’s Supervisory Team has characterized as a "Watershed Moment" without examining their dismissal of recent charges brought against Bishop Sprague.  More importantly, presentations and discussions such as this forum will allow United Methodists throughout the Northern Illinois Conference an opportunity to decide for themselves what they believe to be the Biblical Truth about the doctrines that are at the root of this controversy.

The charges in the complaint against Bishop Sprague state that his positions are contrary to the Statement of Faith in the United Methodist Book of Discipline. This controversy became public when a transcript of Bishop Sprague’s speech at Iliff Seminary was released in the summer of 2002.  Subsequent to that, Chapter 4 of his book, "Affirmations of a Dissenter" was released by Bishop Sprague on the NIC web site. 

In the fall of 2002, the United Methodist Reporter published a series of articles contrasting excerpts from Chapter 4 of Bishop Sprague’s book with the published response of Bishop Whitaker.

In addition, various renewal groups officially within the UMC, as well as other groups not officially connected, have covered various aspects of this controversy on their web sites.  They have published information and opinions about the complaint that was made by a group of laity and clergy late in 2002, and the subsequent dismissal in February of 2003.  These groups provide a forum for this and other issues of concern within the UMC.  

NIC VOICE offers concerned laity within NIC churches an opportunity to become more INFORMED in order to confirm our beliefs and participate more fully within our conference and denomination:

Pray for all of those in leadership, in our church, our conference and our denomination so that we will be obedient to God's leadership and renewal so we can glorify the name of Jesus in our personal lives and as a church and denomination.

Become educated about these issues. To become more fully informed about the book and the complaint, NIC VOICE has established a web site (www.nicvoice.org) with resources for education, as well as laity speakers to assist UMC laity in examining the theology behind Bishop Sprague's controversial statements (see reverse side for summary). One of the resources on the web site is a downloadable Microsoft™ PowerPoint presentation which covers the history of the complaint, the key doctrinal issues, the complaint's dismissal and subsequent commentaries in order to provide balanced information within the Northern Illinois Conference.

Upon invitation by interested congregations, the group will send a speaker to facilitate discussion and give the presentation; however, churches may elect to use one of their own members and utilize the resources on the www.nicvoice.org web site, including the Microsoft™ PowerPoint presentation. The NIC VOICE presentation includes various responses made by other Bishops and additional information pertinent to all NIC churches. This is in harmony with the recommendations by the Supervisory Response Team's dismissal of charges.

Elect theologically sound delegates from Northern Illinois to General Conference and Jurisdictional Conference. Bishops are elected by the Jurisdictional Conference while the General Conference sets the direction of the entire church.

Is Jesus "God with Us" sent by God to earth conceived by the Virgin Mary, or did he have two human parents, Mary and an unnamed father?

Bishop C. Joseph Sprague

Affirmations of a Dissenter: Chapter 4, "Fully Human Jesus" (underlined added for emphasis)

UMC BOD Articles of Faith

Article VII (excerpts with underlining for emphasis)

Holy Bible (NIV)

Colossians 2: 9-10

"Thus, if the Virgin Birth did not occur in a physical historical sense, if Jesus were born of human parents, as I affirm he was, and if Jesus did not possess trans-human super-natural powers, as I do not believe he did, what sense can we make of the miraculous stories about him in the gospel accounts?"

"The Son, who is the Word of the Father… of one substance with the Father, took man's nature in the womb of the blessed Virgin; so that two whole and perfect natures, that is to say, the Godhead and Manhood, were joined together in one person…. was crucified, dead, and buried, to reconcile his Father to us, and to be a sacrifice, not only for original guilt, but also for actual sins of men."

"Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign: The virgin will be with child and will give birth to a son, and will call him Immanuel". Isaiah 7:14

"For in Christ all the fullness of the Deity lives in bodily form, and you have been given fullness in Christ, who is the head over every power and authority."

Was Jesus physically resurrected to a glorified, physical body, or was his body buried, stolen or lost and his resurrection spiritual?

Bishop C. Joseph Sprague

From transcript speech at Illif in Denver, Colorado

UMC BOD Articles of Faith

Article III (excerpts with underlining for emphasis)

Holy Bible (NIV)

I Corinthians 15:16-19

"I affirm resurrection, the resurrection of Jesus. God’s essence cannot be killed, buried, or kept from being alive in creation or history. God is from everlasting to everlasting. But, resurrection, including that of Jesus, does not include bodily resuscitation."

"Christ did truly rise again from the dead, and took again his body, with all things appertaining to the perfection of man's nature, wherewith he ascended into heaven, and there sitteth until he return to judge all men at the last day." (Underlining added for emphasis)

"For if the dead are not raised, then Christ has not been raised either. And if Christ has not been raised, your faith is futile; you are still in your sins. Then those also who have fallen asleep [died] in Christ are lost. If only for this life we have hope in Christ, we are to be pitied more than all men."
Is Jesus the way of salvation offered to all people, or one of other ways to God?

Bishop C. Joseph Sprague

From transcript speech at Illif in Denver, Colorado

UMC Book of Discipline Articles of Faith

Article XXI (excerpts with underlining for emphasis)

Holy Bible (NIV)

Acts 4:12

John 14: 6

"Having so affirmed Jesus as God’s unique and normative revelation, I must dissent from Christocentric exclusives which hold that Jesus is the only way to God’s gift of salvation. Such an arrogant claim stands over and against the inclusive Jesus of the synoptics and limits God in ways that humans cannot and must not."

"… The offering of Christ once made, is that perfect redemption, propitiation, and satisfaction for all the sins of the whole world, both original and actual; and there is none other satisfaction for sin but that alone…"

"Salvation is found in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given to men by which we must be saved."

"Jesus answered, 'I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me'."

Was Jesus’ death on the cross a substitutionary atonement to pay for our sins and reconcile us to God, or simply an example of discipleship?

Bishop C. Joseph Sprague

From transcript of speech at Illif and

"Fully Human Jesus" (underlined added for emphasis)

UMC BOD Articles of Faith

Article VIII (excerpts with underlining for emphasis)

Holy Bible (NIV)

Hebrews 9:14-15

"Nevertheless, I find the substitutionary atonement theory, which is but one of several Christian theories of atonement, to be at odds with other images of God reflected by the witness of Jesus and experienced by this writer."

"While sacrifice as an act of discipleship is essential for all of us as it was for Jesus, the concept of blood sacrifice to appease God is superstition at best and an idolatrous allegiance to a non-Jesus methodology of God-human relationship at worst."

"The Son, who is the Word of the Father… of one substance with the Father, took man's nature in the womb of the blessed Virgin; so that two whole and perfect natures, that is to say, the Godhead and Manhood, were joined together in one person…. was crucified, dead, and buried, to reconcile his Father to us, and to be a sacrifice, not only for original guilt, but also for actual sins of men."

"How much more, then, will the blood of Christ who through the eternal Sprit offered himself unblemished to God, cleanse our consciences from acts that lead to death, so that we may serve the living God! For this reason, Christ is the mediator of a new covenant, that those who are called may receive the promised eternal inheritance--now that he has died as a ransom to set them free from the sins committed under the first covenant."

 


website maintained by Servantweb.com Hit Counter