|
December, Volume 1, Issue 9 |
|
NIC
VOICE is
a growing network of concerned laity whose purpose is to provide
balanced information and dialog within the Northern Illinois Conference
(NIC).
NOTE:
NIC
VOICE
is not an
official publication of the Northern Illinois Conference or the United
Methodist Church. See our Disclaimer below. |
|
Advent Meditation

Click Here for Christianity Today
Resources:
…a Savior has been born…
And
the angel said to them, "Be not afraid; for behold, I bring you good
news of a great joy which will come to all the people; for to you is
born this day in the city of David a Savior, who is Christ the Lord."

—Luke
2:10-11 RSV
|
|
Have
you visited the
NIC VOICE Comments
Section
lately? SIX new Comments have been added. |
|
Have
you visited
the NIC VOICE Resources & Links
Section? Great resources are added frequently! Check it out!
Q:
Doesn’t the Bible teach we shouldn’t have disagreements with each other?
A. This
answer is from "Developing the Art of Gracious Disagreement - Surviving
Church Conflict":
"Conflict
is unavoidable and not necessarily bad.
We don't need to feel guilty just because we are involved in church
conflict. Trouble is unavoidable. Conflict will come. It comes to the
best of churches, to the best of spiritual leaders, to the best of
church boards, and to the best of friendships. Conflict came to Jesus
and His inner circle. It came between Paul and Barnabas, and Paul and
Peter. Conflict came not only to the immature church of Corinth, but to
the much more mature church in Philippi. Conflict came to the inner
circle of Christ even after He had served them communion on the night of
His betrayal."
In
addition, "Paul, however, never asked for the kind of oneness that
compromises the interests or doctrines of Christ. Just as important,
Paul never encouraged us to protect or cover one another at the expense
of what is right or true. Look again at Galatians 2:11-16 and
Philippians 2:1-5. While these two texts look and feel very different,
there is something very similar about them. In both cases, Paul argued
passionately for the interests and cause of Christ. In both cases, Paul
asked for unity based on right beliefs. In both cases, Paul showed how
important it is to look out for one another and not just for ourselves."
For the full on-line
contents of this brochure is at Radio Bible Class Ministries:
Developing the Art of Gracious Disagreement.
|
|
Thought to Ponder |
|
Wesley on the Scriptures
"The faith of the Protestants, in general, embraces only those truths as
necessary to salvation, which are clearly revealed in the oracles of God
. . . The written Word is the whole and sole rule of their faith, as
well as practice. We believe, indeed, that 'all Scripture is given by
the inspiration of God,' and herein we are distinguished from other
non-Christian religions. We believe the written Word of God to be the
only and sufficient rule both of Christian faith and practice."
-- John Wesley
|
|
Scripture to Ponder |
|
Beloved, believe not
every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many
false prophets are gone out into the world."
-- 1 John 4:1
|
Have you
shared the
NIC VOICE
Newsletter with other UMC members?
A
Bit of History
The
Methodist Connection
By Dr. Frederick P.
Brooks, Jr., Department of Computer Science, The University of North
Carolina at Chapel
Hill.
This address was delivered
at the eleventh annual Good News Convocation in 1980. It is as relevant
today as it was then.
We are confused in our theology, therefore
we should consider division. We are remote and impersonal in much of our
over-centralized function; therefore we should consider devolution of
function down from Annual Conferences to Districts, from the General Church
down to lower bodies. We are burdened with top-down programming and
proclamations therefore we should consider de-emphasis. In these
ways, perhaps, we can recover in each of our local churches our first love,
the Lord Jesus Christ, and follow him in holy living that fires a concern
for our neighbors and our society.
We must take to heart, I fear, our Lord’s
message to the church at Sardis,
"You have the name of being alive, and you
are dead, Awake and strengthen what remains and is on the point of death,
for I have not found your works perfect in the sight of God. Remember then
what you received and heard; keep that and repent" (Rev. 3:2-3).
Read
More

NIC VOICE
Around the World
We have had visitors from
the following countries (*** = NEW):
|
Argentina
Australia
Austria
Belgium
Brazil
Canada
Chile
China
Croatia
Denmark
Egypt
Estonia
France
Germany
Greece
Hong Kong |
Hungary
Italy
Israel
Japan
Jordan
S. Korea
Malaysia
Mexico
Morocco
Nepal
Netherlands
New
Zealand
Norway
Pakistan
Peru
Philippines |
Poland
Romania
Russian
Fed.
Seychelles
Singapore
Slovak
Rep.***
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Taiwan
Tanzania
Thailand
Turkey
United
Kingdom
United
States
USSR
(former) |
WATERSHED
MOMENT
It
is important that we not allow the passing of what Bishop Ough’s Supervisory
Team has characterized as a “Watershed Moment” without examining their
dismissal of recent charges brought against Bishop Sprague. More
importantly, presentations and discussions such as this forum will allow
United Methodists throughout the Northern Illinois Conference and beyond an
opportunity to decide for themselves what they believe to be the Biblical
Truth about the doctrines that are at the root of this controversy.
The charges
in the complaint against Bishop Sprague state that his positions are
contrary to the Statement of Faith in the United Methodist Book of
Discipline. This controversy became public when a transcript of Bishop
Sprague’s speech at Iliff Seminary was released in the summer of 2002.
Subsequent to that, Chapter 4 of his book, “Affirmations of a Dissenter” was
released by Bishop Sprague on the NIC web site.
In the fall
of 2002, the UMReporter published a series of articles contrasting excerpts
from Chapter 4 of Bishop Sprague’s book with the published response of
Bishop Whitaker.
In addition,
various renewal groups officially within the UMC, as well as other groups
not officially connected, have covered various aspects of this controversy
on their web sites. They have published information and opinions about the
complaint that was made by a group of laity and clergy late in 2002, and the
subsequent dismissal in February of 2003. These groups provide a forum for
this and other issues of concern within the UMC.
MISSION
NIC
VOICE is
a growing network of concerned laity whose purpose is to provide balanced
information and dialog within the Northern Illinois Conference of the UMC
about Doctrinal Issues raised by the Bishop Sprague Complaint & Dismissal.
This is in
harmony with the recommendations by the Supervisory Response Team's
dismissal of charges. They urged that the laity become involved in the
process of "serious theological reflection on issues of Biblical Authority,
Christology and the Mission of the Church".
Questions or
comments about NIC
VOICE
may be directed to:
nicvoice@nicvoice.org.
NIC VOICE
offers the laity
within NIC churches an opportunity to become more
INFORMED:
Upon
invitation from a NIC church or group,
NIC VOICE
will provide a speaker to conduct a presentation entitled "Discussion of
Theological and Doctrinal Issues in the UMC Raised by the Bishop Sprague
Complaint & Dismissal", or
You may
choose to conduct the presentation 'in-house', using the NIC
VOICE
Watershed Moment Presentation, at a single meeting or in a series of
studies on these key doctrinal issues of:
·
Christology (Trinity, Virgin Birth, Deity of Jesus)
·
Resurrection of Jesus Christ
·
Salvation through Jesus Christ Alone
·
The Atonement of Jesus Christ
SUBSCRIPTIONS
To
subscribe/unsubscribe, go to
newsletter.htm.
If you don't
have Web access, send your name and email address to:nicvoice@nicvoice.org
or contact
us:
NIC VOICE
P.O. Box 604
Crystal Lake,
IL 60039-0604
For past
issues, visit our archives at newsletter.htm.
Tell a friend
about
NIC VOICE.
It's free! If they do not have e-mail access, you can print this newsletter
and distribute it (see
REPRINT AND FORWARD POLICY
below.)
DISCLAIMER
NIC
VOICE is
sponsored by a laity-led network in the Northern Illinois Conference of the
United Methodist Church dedicated to providing balanced information and
dialog about issues of concern relating to the Bishop Sprague Complaint &
Dismissal. This group has sole responsibility for the content of this
letter.
NIC VOICE
provides original content on our web site and may distribute information
from other sources. NIC
VOICE
exercises no more editorial control over such information from other sources
than does a typical public library, bookstore, or newsstand. The views and
opinions expressed in such information do not necessarily reflect those of
NIC VOICE.
Copyright
(c) 2003,
NIC VOICE.
All rights reserved.
REPRINT AND
FORWARD POLICY
Subscribers are
encouraged to forward NIC
VOICE
News Letter and web
site links
to others and/or print it in its entirety,
without any changes, for noncommercial use only. If forwarding to another
publication, please do so with the appropriate citation NIC
VOICE
in accordance with "fair use" rules, and our
Disclaimer.
You can
easily forward the
NIC VOICE
News Letter at
newsletter.htm using the
Send this Newsletter link to a friend
capability.
UNSUBSCRIBE
NIC
VOICE News
is sent to inform you about significant additions to our web site or
relevant information. If you would like to be removed from this list, please
click on the word
"UNSUBSCRIBE".
Past
Issues
|
|
|
|
|
NIC
VOICE Response to bishops responding to NIC VOICE letter to all active
bishops
CURRENT STATUS: Response
from Council of Bishops President but no announced action on Response
Team Recommendations 1&2 – Read More\
Recently, NIC VOICE was asked a serious of questions about Bishop
Sprague's retirement and the future. These questions and NIC VOICE's
answers follow and are now also included in the NIC
VOICE FAQ:
Q: What will the
Northern Illinois Conference gain/lose by his retirement?
The events of the last
year have placed the NIC at the crossroads of time – this has been our
Watershed Moment. In the face of such challenges, the response has been
muted; in the clergy, by fear of repercussions and in the laity by
disinterest, apathy, lack of understanding of Methodist theology and
lack of knowledge. Only time will tell if God has removed His hand
from the UMC in general and the NIC in particular. Prayer is the only
key that will unlock this door.
Many pastors feel that they do not know what the future holds and
determine that they will focus on the ministry in their own church.
Some laity and clergy have simply “dropped out” of the Annual
Conference, not participating at all. Perhaps a new bishop can
encourage the return of many who feel that they would rather not be a
part of the NIC.
The retirement of Bishop Sprague, and some of his colleagues in
the Council of Bishops, clears the way for the possible election and
assignment of visionary episcopal leaders who are grounded in the
apostolic, ecumenical faith, relevant to the spiritual seeking of the
current generation.
Q:
Is NIC VOICE doing anything to influence who is named his replacement?
NIC VOICE
remains focused on our key objectives
to reach out and provide a forum for education. The NIC VOICE website
at,
www.nicvoice.org is the primary vehicle, along with
presentations in churches in the conference. We hope that through this
process, laity will become more involved in the conference in the coming
years.
In
addition, NIC VOICE was
invited to speak at the
Forum for Evangelical Theology at Garrett-Evangelical Theological
Seminary in October 2003. The topic of the
presentation was
“Contending for the Faith." We believe that one of the
essential elements for education is to reach out to the seminaries to
help them understand how laity feel about the theological issues within
the UMC.
We
have submitted 25 petitions and resolutions for consi-deration at the
General Conference of 2004. These will add our voice to those of
similar content that have been or will be submitted by other
conservative factions within the UMC.
With regard to this upcoming election of a new bishop, our primary
attempts to influence the election and assignment of bishops are made
through prayer. We long for the day when Bishops are in partnership with
the laity and clergy of their annual conferences and focused on the
mission of making disciples of Jesus Christ.
The Northern Illinois Conference Evangelical Association (NICEA)
was established five years
ago to provide a forum to uphold “The Centrality of the Bible, Upholding
Our Doctrinal Standards, and our engagement in the world through UMC
Social Principles”. We have communicated to NICEA the thoughts and
feelings of concerned laity and clergy (some of these are posted at the
Comments section of our website, but many others are personal
reflections from both clergy and laity), and this group will be speaking
directly to the NIC Jurisdictional Delegation, and is additionally
studying actions that could be taken to be influential in the overall
North Central Jurisdiction election process.
Q:
What is the status of the recommendations of the response team that
dismissed the complaint against Bishop Sprague?
Complaints dismissed against Bishop Joseph Sprague
NIC (Northern Illinois Conference) VOICE
recently reached out to all active
bishops requesting a response regarding the implementation of
recommendations made by the response team in the dismissal of the
complaint against Bishop Sprague.
The letters were mailed to each bishop on September 5, 2003 and included
51 authorized signatures by both laity and clergy within the Northern
Illinois Conference and other conferences throughout the United States.
Click here to read the full text of the letter:
NIC VOICE Letter of Concern to all Active Bishops.
Click here to read three bishops responses:
Response to NIC VOICE September 5, 2003 Letter to All Active Bishops,
including Bishops Keaton, Weaver and President of the
Council of Bishops,
Bishop Ruediger R. Minor.
Click here to read NIC VOICE
response to Bishop Keaton and Bishop Weaver:
NIC VOICE
Response to NIC VOICE September 5, 2003 Letter to All Active Bishops
From the response to Bishop Keaton:
…In your letter, you indicated we
should direct our inquiry regarding Response Team recommendation #1 to
Bishop Sprague. He did receive our letter, and as of this date has not
responded (he has been on renewal leave until October 1).
We agree with your suggestion that
Question # 2 be directed to the Council of Bishops President, who also
was sent our letter by mail and email and as of this date has not
responded…
From the response to Bishop Weaver:
…In
your letter, you indicated that the North Central Jurisdiction has the
responsibility to monitor, and select a third party to facilitate
dialogue between the parties concerning the theological and doctrinal
issues presented in this case. We are not aware of any steps by the
Jurisdiction to ensure that this Response Team recommendation is
implemented.
We are encouraged that you have
indicated the Council of Bishops is already exploring and planning many
things connected to the second recommendation of the Response Team. We
anticipate such future positive actions and responses as a result of
actions by both individual Bishops and the Council as a whole….
To
date, even after the Council met earlier this month, there has been no
action on Response Team Recommendations 1 & 2 that has been communicated
to the church.
In
Bishop Minor’s response, he notes that, “It seems to me that you see
the Council of Bishops ‘in charge’ of the further process of the
Response Team's recommendations.
However, dealing with complaints against a bishop falls in the
responsibility of such bishop's
Jurisdictional College and Committee on
Episcopacy.” He further
recommended that, “to receive an answer to your first two questions,
you should address them to the North Central Jurisdiction.” Both
Bishops Ough and Bishop Lee, who chaired the North Central
Jurisdictional response team in the Bishop Sprague complaint, received
NIC VOICE’s letter.
Neither has provided an update.
Regarding Response Team Recommendation 2, Bishop Minor continued, “…
I can inform you that the Council of Bishops' Standing Committee on
Teaching Concerns is working on a proposal, how the intent of this
recommendation could best be fulfilled. In the meantime, several
persons from this Committee as well as from the wider Council have come
forward with personal contributions to these around Christology and the
mission of the Church.”
We
intend to remain involved, making certain that the response team’s
recommendations are acted upon in a timely manner. The laity and clergy
are watching to see if these matters are a priority to the Council of
Bishops.
If
we really believe that faith in Jesus Christ, our Lord and Savior, who
is God Incarnate and died to atone for our sins, determines whether a
person spends eternity in heaven or hell, then we must be compelled to
boldly proclaim this truth in love, and to call our Conference and the
UMC to uphold our doctrinal standards. God will hold us accountable
for the gospel He has entrusted to us. |
|
Report on Northern Illinois Annual Conference Special Session, November
15, 2003
Northern Illinois Conference UMC Conference Lay Leader Letter, September
2003
The lay member(s) of the annual
conference, along with the pastor, shall serve as an interpreter of the
action of the annual conference session. These persons (lay members and
pastors) shall report to the local church council on actions of the
annual conference as soon as possible, but not later than three months
after the close of the conference."
Read More
Clergy Response to Northern Illinois Conference UMC Conference Lay
Leader Letter, September 2003
I read
your fax pertaining to sharing the actions of our most recent annual
conference session with particular interest in the wording about
celebrating the wonderful responses received.
I feel compelled to share with you some
other types of responses to the actions of our annual conference. I
came to the new church to find many faithful, longtime United Methodists
hurt and angry at some of the actions.
Read More
NIC
Annual Conference Resolutions
Special Session 11-15-2003 Results
UMC
General Conference 2004 Pittsburgh, PA
NIC VOICE network prepared 19 resolutions for individual members to send
to GC 2004
Faithful
Christian Laity prepared six (6) resolutions for individual members to
send to GC2004
Current News – NIC VOICE Home
Page
One
Last Time Final
Commentary by Raymond Rooney, Pastor, December 10, 2003
"But herein lies the purpose of this final
commentary. It is my opinion that enough has been said. As the Scripture
above indicates, “of making many books [or writing many commentaries]
there is no end; and much study is a weariness of flesh. Let us hear the
conclusion of the whole matter: Fear God and keep His commandments for
this is the whole duty of man.” We have reached the point where
everything is out in the open and obvious. Everyone pretty much knows
who the evangelicals and progressives are and where each stands. The
same points are being made over and over and over again. As the preacher
of Ecclesiastes says, let’s just cut to the chase: fear and obey God.
Period." Read
More
UM
Action :
ActionBriefing
|
UM Action
Briefing - November 2003
|
|
|
Source: UMAction, December 2, 2003 |
Click Here to View the November 2003 Issue of UMAction
Briefing
Contents
- Bishop
Talbert Falsely Attacks Entire Renewal and Reform Movement
- Bristol
House Offers Faithful Confirmation Materials for UMs.
- Church and
Society Board Again Tries to Change UM Stand on Homosexuality
- World
Council of Churches Accuses U.S. of "Aggression" and "Illegal"
War; Implies President Bush is War Criminal
- Church
Homosexuality Advocates Promote Multiple Homosexual Partners
|
Methodist
Bishops Meet on Capitol Hill, IRD
(Institute for Religion & Democray), November 25, 2003
[There was no reporting
by either the UMNS, UMR or IRD of any public discussion in this session
of the
Response Team's Recommendations 1 & 2 regarding the dismissal of the
complaint against Bishop C. Joseph Sprague, Northern Illinois
Conference. --editor's note]
During a break, Bishop Joe Sprague of Chicago took the floor.
"I
have promised to maintain my vow of silence but now must break it,"
Sprague said. He lamented the growth of U.S. military spending and
complained that U.S. foreign aid was too low. Sprague also lamented that
the U.S. comprises only four percent of the world’s population but has
25 percent of the world’s prison inmates.
"The greatest experience of my life took place here," Sprague recalled
of his arrest earlier this year while performing civil disobedience
outside the White House in a demonstration against the U.S. war in Iraq.
"Seventy-seven of us were arrested [for being against] against an
immoral war," he observed. "It’s been said that I’m an incompatible
bishop, but on that occasion I was in good company."
Read More
The
Bishop Who Denied the Virgin Birth - Chicago Sun Times, November 20,
2003
Does Sprague
believe, as traditional Christianity teaches, that Jesus Christ was
raised from the grave on the third day and is alive today?
"I would
differentiate between Jesus and Christ," he said. "Christ is very much
alive. Jesus, the person? No."
As for the New
Testament account that Jesus Christ was born to a virgin, Mary, Sprague
said it was a myth, or a metaphor, that was not intended to be taken
literally.
Read More
Bishop
Joseph C. Sprague’s Sermon at Northern Illinois Conference Special
Session, Saturday, November 23, 2002
Confirmed Trust
...Bishop Timothy Whitaker of the Florida Area and I do theology
differently. In particular, we work at understanding, explaining and
proclaiming Christology — words about Jesus the Christ — differently.
His is a high Christology; mine is low. He works from above — from
essence; I work from below — from existence. He is anchored in creedal
language and historic understandings; I step out to seek to find modern
and relevant expressions of the same reality. His understanding is that
Jesus was born the Christ, an essential part of God; my understanding is
that Jesus was born fully human and by his response of faith, as trust
and obedience to God’s initiatory grace, became the Christ.
Bishop Whitaker and I bake Christological crust differently. And, as you
know, we have been placed in juxtaposition to one another — not at a
table in a church basement — but in the national and international
Church press...Read
More
Letters
to the Editor - Reporter Interactive June 25, 2003
Renewal groups ‘only
hope?’
I couldn’t help commenting on
the article “Group alleges Wesleyan ‘think and let’ think perspective’
endangered” (see Reporter, May 30.) That piece goes on to play up the
book, United Methodism@Risk and criticize all of the organizations and
movements within the church that support a move back to the
denomination’s historical foundations.
I
agree wholeheartedly that United Methodism is at risk: one needs only to
look at the precipitous decline in membership to see that. I fear that
if the present trends toward disbelief in Scripture and “anything goes”
continue, The United Methodist Church will become an interesting
historic relic.
Perhaps those organizations criticized in the book are the only hope for
us to once again become an active, growing denomination.
Richard J. Lane, Palos Heights, Illinois
Presentation
Introduction to NIC
VOICE Watershed Moment Presentation at Cornerstone UMC, October 25, 200
by Michael McKellar,
host of presentation
Why this
presentation?
§
“Affirmations of a Dissenter”
by C. Joseph Sprague
Here’s
what I’ve Learned
§
Heresy
has been with us since the very infancy of the church.
§
A heresy
is simply a doctrine that strays from the established Christian belief
and central doctrines.
§
A heretic
is someone who adheres to and teaches this unorthodox doctrine.
§
Most
heretics believe in Christ
What are
the Central Doctrines?
“Central
doctrines” of the Christian faith are those doctrines that make the
Christian faith Christian and not something else.
What are
the Central Doctrines?
Central
doctrines include the Trinity, the deity of Christ,
the bodily resurrection, the atoning work of
Christ on the cross, and salvation by grace through faith.
These doctrines comprise the essence of the Christian faith that to
remove any of them is to make the belief system non-Christian.
What are
the Central Doctrines?
The
meaning of the expression “Christian faith” is not like a wax nose,
which can be twisted to mean whatever the speaker wants it to mean.
NIC VOICE Watershed Moment
is AVAILABLE on-line!
Highlights from Notes:
Slide
26: Authority of Scripture
What does Biblical Authority mean?
Anglican theologian, J.I. Packer (as
quoted by Elliott Miller at
http://www.equip.org/free/DA310.htm, states:
“The real difference between
Evangelicals and those who call them obscurantists lies in the realm of
method. We disagree as to the principles that should guide the Christian
judgment. Our critics say that the way in which we deal with the Bible
is fundamentally dishonest.
We reply that they think so only
because the way in which they deal with the Bible is fundamentally
unchristian. They hold that what needs revision is our doctrine of
biblical authority; but it seems that what really needs revision is
their method of biblical scholarship. Instead of subjecting their own
judgment wholly to Scripture, they subject Scripture in part to their
own judgment.
They treat the question of the truth
and authority of Scripture, which God has closed, as if it were still
open; they assume the right and competence of the Christian student to
decide for himself how much of the Bible’s teaching should be received
as authoritative.
They accept what they do accept, not
simply because it is Scripture, but because it satisfies some further
criteria of credibility which they have set up; so that even when they
believe the right thing, in so far as they are consistent subjectivists
they do so for the wrong reason.
Their whole approach to the Bible
is fundamentally unbiblical.” (Emphasis added)
Acknowledgments - NIC VOICE
NIC VOICE recognized by Laity of the North Indiana Conference of the UMC
Following is an excerpt from the Laity North Indiana Conference
acknowledging
NIC VOICE:
“LOOK!
A Laity Voice From The Northern Illinois
Conference (This site "...is a
growing network of concerned laity whose purpose is to provide balanced
information and dialog within the Northern Illinois Conference of the
UMC about Doctrinal Issues raised by the Bishop Sprague Complaint &
Dismissal. This is in harmony with the recommendations by the
Supervisory Response Team's dismissal of charges. They urged that the
laity become involved in the process of 'serious theological reflection
on issues of Biblical Authority, Christology and the Mission of the
Church'." This site is chock full of information.”
Laity of the North
Indian Conference of the United Methodist Church added to the
VOICE CIRCUIT – Get Connected:

Letters
to the Editor - Reporter Interactive June 25, 2003
Elites losing control
I can understand Bishop Joseph Sprague’s concern about the Northern
Illinois Voice Web site started by a small group of laity (see Reporter,
May 30). He said, “They are self-appointed and have not to my knowledge
been in conversation with elected lay leadership of this annual
conference.”
The last thing we United Methodists need is for a grassroots group of
laity to actually get involved in theological dialogue, especially
without having gone through the proper conference channels. Can you
imagine what might happen if such activity goes unchecked?
A
theological revival may sweep across the church and the elite leaders
might lose their control. And that understandably, Bishop Sprague could
not endure.
John Battern, Sumner, Iowa
Click Here to read more Acknowledgements! |
|
|
|