Frequently Asked
Questions
Q:
Perhaps he has
proclaimed to
you the virgin birth, but he has given me no such proclamation.
A. God's proclamation
about the Virgin birth is in many places throughout the Bible, Old and New
Testaments. Here is one from Matthew 1 (NIV)
The Birth of
Jesus Christ
18This
is how the birth of Jesus Christ came about: His mother Mary was pledged
to be married to Joseph, but before they came together, she was found to
be with child through the Holy Spirit. 19Because Joseph her
husband was a righteous man and did not want to expose her to public
disgrace, he had in mind to divorce her quietly.
20But after he had considered this, an angel of the Lord
appeared to him in a dream and said, "Joseph son of David, do not be
afraid to take Mary home as your wife, because what is conceived in her
is from the Holy Spirit. 21She will give birth to a son, and
you are to give him the name Jesus,[3]
because he will save his people from their sins."
22All this took place to fulfill what the Lord had said
through the prophet: 23"The virgin will be with child and
will give birth to a son, and they will call him Immanuel"[4]
--which means, "God with us."
24When Joseph woke up, he did what the angel of the Lord had
commanded him and took Mary home as his wife. 25But he had no
union with her until she gave birth to a son. And he gave him the name
Jesus.
The following
information is not on our web site, but might be helpful, “Was
Jesus Really Born of a Virgin”.
On our web site you
will find a
Reflection on Virgin Birth that is based on extensive citations from the
Bible.
Q: Who is NIC VOICE?
A:
NIC VOICE began in February
2003 as an effort among concerned laity in the NIC of the UMC to respond to
the doctrinal issues raised by the Bishop Sprague Complaint & Dismissal.
This is in harmony with the recommendations by the Supervisory Response
Team's dismissal of charges. We believe that many in the NIC are unaware of
these issues, and this is an effort to, as the Response Team encouraged,
help the laity to become involved in the process of "serious theological
reflection on issues of Biblical Authority, Christology and the Mission of
the Church".
Q:
Why is this laity-focused effort?
A. The UMC
has a rich heritage of focus on the laity in the life of the church:
·
As
recommended by the General Conference 2000 Connectional Process Team (CPT)
Report--Part VI Encourage Doctrinal and Theological Discourse,
"United Methodists around the world are connected by a rich array of
doctrinal and theological understandings. Listening to views that differ
from our own is possible when we are in covenantal relationships that are
intellectually honest where we strive together to seek common ground. The
practice of Christian conferencing includes connecting and renewing,
discerning and deciding (emphasis added). Annual conference
sessions, as well as other places, can provide opportunities for the
discourse, debate, and consideration of these doctrinal and theological ties
that bind us."
·
This is in
harmony with the recommendations by the Supervisory Response Team's
dismissal of charges. We believe that many in the NIC are unaware of these
issues, and this is an effort to, as the Response Team encouraged, help the
laity to become involved in the process of "serious theological reflection
on issues of Biblical Authority, Christology and the Mission of the
Church".
·
Bishop
Sprague in Chapter 6 of Affirmations of a Dissenter has encouraged
the introduction of laity into dialog about our social principles and to the
challenge of historic and present-day theological thinking.
·
The UMC mentors and encourages laity. The UMC offers laity
tremendous opportunity for training in growth, such as in the Ministry of
the Laity and opportunities for training within our Annual Conferences.
Q: How can clergy
express support and help NIC VOICE promote “serious theological
reflection on issues of Biblical Authority, Christology and the Mission
of the Church”? Can clergy participate in these discussions?
A.
NIC VOICE welcomes the support, prayer, encouragement and participation
of all those
who affirm the orthodox Christian faith as expressed in the Apostle’s Creed
and whom
uphold the Articles of Faith of the United
Methodist
Church.
Although
from the beginning,
NIC VOICE has
been a laity-driven effort
to educate
and inform
other
members of laity,
UMC Clergy
have
volunteered
financial contributions
and
supported our
efforts by hosting or inviting participation in NIC
VOICE
Watershed Moment Presentations.
To augment and supplement
the development of NIC
VOICE Watershed
Moment Presentation, we
also sought and
obtained
input from
Clergy. In addition,
clergy have offered their comments to us via the NIC
VOICE web site and have graciously
agreed to post their thoughts in our
Comments section.
We are
increasingly convinced that
it is essential
for concerned
laity, clergy and professors of
UMC theological seminaries to
participate in the
dialogue process
and ultimately
help establish the
direction we must take to bring about needed reform and renewal.
Ideas for how
you too can help in this process by becoming
more involved
may be found on our
"Join
us in our Mission" page on the web site.
Q: How is a network different than an organization or group?
A:
NIC VOICE is a growing
network -- laity to laity -- rather than a formal organization or group. NIC
VOICE does not seek to provide news or promote specific
options for renewal or reform since there are established organizations and
groups who are currently performing this service.
NIC VOICE provides a means to help
NIC laity effectively communicate with other NIC laity the key doctrinal
issues in the UMC related to Scriptural Authority and Christology.
Q: How can I talk with someone to get more information?
A: You can click on this link to reach
NIC VOICE:
http://www.nicvoice.org/contact.htm.
Q: How can I schedule a presentation in my church or at my committee
meeting?
A:
You can click on this link to schedule a presentation:
http://www.nicvoice.org/schedule_presentation.htm.
Q: We are not from the Northern Illinois Conference. How can we use the
resources on this web site?
NIC VOICE
believes that this research and information would be of value to UMC laity
outside the Northern Illinois Conference (NIC), so while we are offering our
speakers (at no charge) within the NIC, the web site,
NIC VOICE, has a PowerPoint presentation with speaker
notes that can be downloaded and used by UMC laity wherever they are. We
are offering the resources on the web site at no charge.
Q: How can I get the presentation so that I can present it to my church or
at my committee meeting?
A:
If you have a high speed link, you can download the full presentation with
graphics at this link:
NIC VOICE Presentation - With Graphics
If
you have dial-up, you can download the full presentation without graphics
(smaller file size at this link:
NIC VOICE Presentation - Graphics Free
If
you would like to request NIC VOICE
mail a CD with the presentation, please contact us at
www.nicvoice.org. There will be a nominal fee to prepare and mail the
CD.
Q:
What if I want to revise
the content of the presentation?
A:
You may revise the content with the following disclaimer on each slide that
is revised:
"This
presentation has been revised from its original content downloaded from the
NIC VOICE site. Any changes do not necessarily reflect the views of
the NIC VOICE network. Please view the on-line presentation at
www.nicvoice.org
to view the presentation as officially approved by NIC VOICE.”
Q: What if my pastor is concerned about having an outside group making an
NIC VOICE
presentation at our church?
A:
It can be uncomfortable acknowledging the various positions on doctrinal
issues within our individual churches, conferences and denomination. Yet,
as the Response Team indicates, it is essential to our denomination to have
open dialogue. This must be done in a spirit of love and humility.
Sometimes, it is best to conduct these sessions “in house”; other times, it
may be easier to invite a speaker to facilitate the discussions. Some
prefer pretending that these concerns do not exist, but face continued loss
of membership if we do not openly face and discuss our mutual concerns.
Q: What if my pastor will not let us schedule a meeting to discuss these
issues?
A: First and foremost, pray that the Holy Spirit will guide you as you
seek to know how to educate your members. There are many resources
available to you on
NIC VOICE WEB SITE. You can also inquire to see if
NIC VOICE has scheduled a
presentation at another UM church in your area. We always encourage our
host church groups to extend an open invitation to all UM members.
Q: How does talking about these issues impact our church?
A: Concern for Doctrinal Integrity – How can we “walk together” if there
is division over our core beliefs? What is required in order to join a
local UMC or to be a deacon or an elder? Are there doctrinal standards?
•
Unity in
essential beliefs (what is essential?)
•
Liberty in
non-essentials (what is non-essential?)
•
Truth in
love (what is TRUTH?)
United Methodists cannot separate themselves from their conference and the
denomination. We are a connected body! Those within our community of Faith
and the community-at-large are likely to be asking us what United Methodist
really believe. NIC VOICE
is working to help laity understand the issues raised by the Complaint and
the basis of the Dismissal. All those who claim the name of United
Methodism have a responsibility to understand what the Bible teaches
regarding these issues. We are personally responsible for educating
ourselves and for participating in the process of enlightening others about
what the Articles of Faith and the UMC Book of Discipline have to say about
these doctrines.
Q: Why are we talking about this instead of just trying to ignore it?
A:
If those who call themselves Christians are to have an effective mission in
this world, we must identify the core doctrines of the Bible and hold
ourselves accountable to them. As human beings it is impossible not to
have a belief system! The real issue is, "What set of beliefs are held in
common by UMC members and clergy"?
Q: What are the benefits to me for becoming better informed on these key
issues?
A:
Once we have become better educated about these issues, we'll have the
opportunity to confirm our beliefs and exercise our influence within our
conference and denomination. Ultimately, each of us needs to confirm that we
have professed Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior. Indeed, we must show the
world that we are His disciples by witness and our daily walk in His way.
Q: Why does the presentation only provide information related to Chapters 3
& 4 of Bishop Sprague’s book, Affirmations of a Dissenter?
A. It
is noteworthy that we may all agree with some areas that Bishop Sprague
highlights in his book, such as the need for laity involvement and
education, need for strong pastoral leadership.
There are other areas that are important to understand, but might not be
considered as core doctrines, essential to the Christian faith. Such topics
can be explored more fully once the key issues of Biblical Authority and
Christology have been resolved.
Q. Doesn't the
Bible teach we shouldn't have disagreements with each other?
A. This answer is from
"Developing the Art of Gracious Disagreement - Surviving Church Conflict":
"Conflict is
unavoidable and not necessarily bad. We don't need to feel guilty just because we are involved in
church conflict. Trouble is unavoidable. Conflict will come. It comes to the
best of churches, to the best of spiritual leaders, to the best of church
boards, and to the best of friendships. Conflict came to Jesus and His inner
circle. It came between Paul and Barnabas, and Paul and Peter. Conflict came
not only to the immature
church of Corinth, but to
the much more mature church in Philippi. Conflict came to the inner circle
of Christ even after He had served them communion on the night of His
betrayal."
In addition,
"Paul, however, never
asked for the kind of oneness that compromises the interests or doctrines of
Christ. Just as important, Paul never encouraged us to protect or cover one
another at the expense of what is right or true. Look again at Galatians
2:11-16 and Philippians 2:1-5. While these two texts look and feel very
different, there is something very similar about them. In both cases, Paul
argued passionately for the interests and cause of Christ. In both cases,
Paul asked for unity based on right beliefs. In both cases, Paul showed how
important it is to look out for one another and not just for ourselves."
For
the full on-line contents of this brochure is at Radio Bible Class
Ministries:
Developing the Art of Gracious Disagreement.
Q. Aren’t your web site
resources biased toward your view?
-
In our
mission statement, we state that:
NIC
VOICE is a
growing network of concerned laity whose purpose is to provide
balanced information and dialog within the Northern Illinois Conference
of the UMC about Doctrinal Issues raised by the Bishop Sprague Complaint &
Dismissal.
This is in harmony with
the recommendations by the Supervisory Response Team's dismissal of
charges. They urged that the laity become involved in the process of
"serious theological reflection on issues of Biblical Authority, Christology
and the Mission of the Church".
We affirm the historic,
orthodox understanding of the Apostles’ Creed and the Articles of Religion,
Section III Our Doctrinal Standards and General Rules in the Book of
Discipline.
We have provided a
presentation on the NIC VOICE
web site
NIC VOICE Presentation that offers a voice within the Northern Illinois
Conference (NIC) for the view of those whom Bishop Sprague has identified as
“neo-literalists”. Bishop Sprague’s book and speeches reflect the view of
those whose biblical interpretation and methodology have been defined as
“progressive” or “radical progressive”.
The key sections of
the presentation provide a comparison between the progressive
interpretation, related doctrinal statements from the Book of Discipline,
and scriptures from the Bible in relationship to the authority of Scripture
and the four key doctrinal areas. The presentation also includes views
offered by three UMC bishops regarding Chapter Four: Fully Human Jesus
from Affirmations of a Dissenter.
As noted in an
article, “Straining
The Limits Of Tolerance: Christian Truth's Challenge to Relativism, author
Peter C. Moore quoting Harold A. Netland's Dissonant Voices: Religious
Pluralism and the Question of Truth notes notes that,
“…Far from the usual view
of tolerance, which seeks to embrace all points of view as equally valid, he
argues that tolerance actually presupposes making a judgment about the
content of the other's belief.
You do not tolerate
something with which you agree, therefore "toleration . . . has an element
of disapproval built into its meaning." To tolerate another religious belief
is not to accept that belief in itself, but to accept or endure someone
else's holding that belief.”
Bishop
G. Lindsey Davis, North Georgia Conference, The United Methodist Church
has said,
“…While
showing respect for all persons and beliefs, we are nonetheless called to
share our faith our Jesus Christ.
Among the world religions,
the Christian faith is unique. Paul said it well to Timothy, "There is one
God and one mediator between God and human beings, Christ Jesus, himself
human, who gave himself as a ransom for all people" (1 Timothy 2:5-6 TNIV).
So, let us not be timid.
Let us love, encourage, and bless all our neighbors. And let us offer them,
in God's time, true spiritual nourishment.
Q: Methodism is a very open-minded faith and our church is filled with a
whole spectrum of believers who fellowship with us who hold many diverse
views, from the “radical progressive” to the “neo-literalist”. Why can't we
just allow Bishop Sprague his right to teach and believe what ever he feels
God has laid on his heart?
I don’t agree with the bishop, but we should be accepting of him as
Christians.
We must remember that we are a people of diversity, and no one has a corner
on right and wrong -- everything is relative, so why can't we be big enough
to make room for the views and opinions of progressives, liberals and
conservatives alike?
A.
It is true that we do not have members of the UMC sign a statement of faith
when they join the church. There is room to, as John Wesley put it, “think
and let think”. However, In Wesley’s sermon on Catholic Spirit (which has
nothing to do with the Roman Catholic Church, but with the universal
church), he is very clear that we think and let think except on matters that
strike at the root of our faith.
In
these essential doctrines, he said, we are “as fixed as the sun.” We may
not be a creedal church in a technical sense, but we very definitely have
doctrinal standards and these standards are protected by the restrictive
Rules or the Constitution of the UMC so that they cannot be changed except
in a very unusual situation.
In
fact, the Model Deed of 1763, prepared by Wesley in anticipation of his
death to determine who could and who could not preach in Methodist preaching
houses, states specifically that no one would be allowed to preach who did
not subscribe to the Methodist Doctrinal Standards.
Q. Doesn't everyone have a right to believe whatever he or she thinks is
just and right, and good?
There's no way to really know who is right and who is wrong -- aren't we
supposed to be tolerant of one another's views?
Also, there are many different ways to God -- how's one to know which way
is best for oneself, let alone for somebody else?
The
Copyright applies to the answer to this question:
Unless preceded by
another copyright in the text of the previous article, these data
files/documents are the sole property of Campus Crusade for Christ, Intl.
They may not be altered or edited in any way. They may be printed
only in their entirety for circulation as "freeware," without charge.
All reproductions of this data file and/or document must contain the
copyright notice (i.e., Copyright © 1995-2003 www.greatcom.org or
www.whoisjesus-really.com, etc.) and this Copyright/Reproduction
Limitations notice.
A
complaint often voiced about the Bible is that everyone is entitled to their
own interpretation. Some contend that there is no way to arrive at a
consensus. People point to the variety of denominations as an example that
there can be no unanimity among Bible believers, but even those who do not
believe the Bible is true and factual have little difficulty in discerning
the central message of its teachings.
Within the branches of true Christianity, we find basic
understanding as to what the Bible teaches. Generally they accept the
standards expressed in traditional creeds and covenants that assert such
basic truths. These “standards” delineate common belief that God made
humans in His own image, giving people free choice on how they conduct their
lives -- that mankind chose to rebel against God, thus bringing sin into the
world.
Moreover, such traditional interpretation holds that God, because of His
everlasting love, became both human and deity in the person of Jesus Christ
and died a substitutionary death on behalf of all persons, thereby paying
the price for us so that we might avoid just punishment for our sins. Just
by placing our faith and trust in Jesus Christ and accepting this free gift
of grace, it is possible to receive salvation and be restored to a personal
relationship with God.
The
Bible’s message is clear for those who will but pray for the illumination of
the Holy Spirit as we read the passages with an open mind, seeking to
understand the gospel message God has put there for us. The problem comes
about by people attempting to make the Word fit their preconceived ideas.
The fault lies with those who insist on personal interpretations by twisting
the message in order to bolster agreement with whatever it is they wish it
to say.
Although divisions arising from different interpretations and applications
of Scripture have resulted in the establishment of various denominations, it
must be stressed that generally these differences arise over doctrines that
are not essential to the core beliefs of Christianity’s central teachings.
Some people use these differences as an excuse for not believing and
accepting Jesus as Lord and Savior, but that excuse proves to be entirely
invalid.
Jesus made the main issue crystal-clear: "He who believes in the Son has
eternal life; but he who does not obey the Son shall not see life, but the
wrath of God abides on him" (John 3:36). The critical issue is not that
of some differences in interpretation or denominations, but rather the
person of Christ Himself. He clearly and repeatedly claimed to be God
Himself and the ultimate Judge of everyone. What will you do with the person
of Jesus and His claims?
Q. I believe the Bible teaches that Jesus Christ is both the son of
man and the Son of God, and I think all Deacons, Elders, Bishops and other
clerical officials are obligated to live according to their pledges and vows
given to both God and the Church. What can I do as an individual to
hold our leadership accountable for their actions?
The
ACTION section of the NIC VOICE
web site has some initial steps of action for your consideration. In
addition, the
Links and Resources provides you with links to various resources to
explore to learn more about the various reform and renewal efforts within
the UMC, as well as a myriad of other helpful links. This could be your
portal into not only information on the UMC but evangelical Christianity.
Q. What can our church do to keep faith with the Bible, the values of John
Wesley and the traditional creeds of our fathers?
A.
The Resources for Further Study
section of the NIC VOICE web
site provides you with information about several good Bible study resources,
including the Disciple series.
Q.
How is NIC VOICE contributing to spiritual growth in addition to dialog and
education?
A.
NIC VOICE has developed a
growing list of suggested resources at
Links and Resources.
We hope many will find these resources useful for spiritual growth,
especially the books in the bibliography. We are continuing to update this
bibliography. In order to explore more deeply our Wesleyan heritage, we are
developing resources related to John Wesley at
What Would Wesley Say. There is ongoing work in this area. There is also a
section that provides more in-depth reflections on the doctrinal areas of
concern at
Reflections on Doctrine.
The
following questions are from recent Comments submitted to the
NIC VOICE web site:
Q.
My real concern is the question of whether a UM needs to subscribe to
certain doctrines.
A.
With regard to what we believe as members of the UMC, as stated in Paragraph
216 in the 2000 United Methodist Book of Discipline
“When persons unite with a local United Methodist church,
they, or, if unable to answer for themselves, their parent(s), legal
guardian(s), sponsor(s) or godparent(s), profess their faith in God, the
Father Almighty, maker of heaven and earth; in Jesus Christ his only Son,
and in the Holy Spirit. Thus, they make known their desire to live their
daily lives as disciples of Jesus Christ. They covenant together with God
and with the members of the local church to keep the vows which are a part
of the order of confirmation and reception into the Church:
1.
To renounce
the spiritual forces of wickedness, reject the evil powers of the world, and
repent of their sin;
2.
To accept the
freedom and power God gives them to resist evil, injustice, and oppression;
3.
To confess
Jesus Christ as Savior, put their whole trust in his grace, and promise to
serve him as their Lord;
4.
To remain
faithful members of Christ’s holy church and serve as Christ’s
representatives in the world;
5.
To be loyal
to The United Methodist Church and do all in their power to strengthen its
ministries;
6.
To faithfully
participate in its ministries by their prayers, their presence, their gifts,
and their service;
7.
To receive and profess the Christian faith as contained in
the Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments.
In
addition, the Meaning of Membership in the UMC is stated at:
Meaning of Membership in the United Methodist Church.
When
describing our beliefs, the official UMC web site contains the following
words, "Our
Doctrinal Standards and General Rules.
What
is a standard? Mirriam Webster's defines a standard as, "something
established by authority, custom, or general consent as a model or example:
CRITERION".
Included in our Doctrinal Standards that describe the UMC
view of the "Christian faith as
contained in the Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments"
is the following statement:
Article
II—Of the Word, or Son of God, Who Was Made Very Man
The Son, who is the Word of
the Father, the very and eternal God, of one substance with the Father, took
man's nature in the womb of the blessed Virgin; so that two whole and
perfect natures, that is to say, the Godhead and Manhood, were joined
together in one person, never to be divided; whereof is one Christ, very God
and very Man, who truly suffered, was crucified, dead, and buried, to
reconcile his Father to us, and to be a sacrifice, not only for original
guilt, but also for actual sins of men.
The complete Articles of
Faith are located at:
Our Doctrinal Standards and General Rules - Articles of Faith
UMC Beliefs are
described at:
United Methodist Beliefs
These are not standards
or beliefs or opinions of NIC VOICE
(although we affirm them), but the stated beliefs and standards of the
United Methodist Church. The reason that these are important is that they
reflect agreement with the Bible on the person and mission of Jesus Christ,
our Lord and Savior.
Q.
Perhaps he has
proclaimed to you the virgin birth, but he has given me no such
proclamation.
A. God's proclamation
about the Virgin birth is in many places throughout the Bible, Old and New
Testaments. Here is one from Matthew 1 (NIV)
The Birth of Jesus
Christ
18This
is how the birth of Jesus Christ came about: His mother Mary was pledged to
be married to Joseph, but before they came together, she was found to be
with child through the Holy Spirit. 19Because Joseph her husband
was a righteous man and did not want to expose her to public disgrace, he
had in mind to divorce her quietly.
20But after he had considered this, an angel of the Lord appeared
to him in a dream and said, "Joseph son of David, do not be afraid to take
Mary home as your wife, because what is conceived in her is from the Holy
Spirit. 21She will give birth to a son, and you are to give him
the name Jesus,[3]
because he will save his people from their sins."
22All this took place to fulfill what the Lord had said through
the prophet: 23"The virgin will be with child and will give birth
to a son, and they will call him Immanuel"[4]
--which means, "God with us."
24When Joseph woke up, he did what the angel of the Lord had
commanded him and took Mary home as his wife. 25But he had no
union with her until she gave birth to a son. And he gave him the name
Jesus.
The following
information is not on our web site, but might be helpful, “Was
Jesus Really Born of a Virgin”.
On our web site you will
find a
Reflection on Virgin Birth that is based on extensive citations from the
Bible.
Q.
I find your
inability to accept the fact that I don't agree with you to be hard to take.
I hope that you learn to be more tolerant.
With regard to
tolerance, Josh McDowell, noted Christian author, notes that:
Webster's defines
the word "tolerate" as follows: "to recognize and respect [others' beliefs,
practices, etc.] without sharing them" and "to bear or put up with [someone
or something not especially liked]."
This traditional
definition is perfectly compatible with Scripture. In fact, the Bible says
we are to "accept one another, then, just as Christ accepted you, in order
to bring praise to God" (Romans 15:17, NIV). This is the same attitude that
Paul expressed in his first epistle to the Corinthian church when he
explained that love "endureth all things" (13:7, KJV). This type of
tolerance
differentiates between a person's thoughts or actions and the person
himself (emphasis added). Unfortunately, the dictionary definitions of tolerance no
longer capture the full meaning promoted by the "new tolerance;" at least
not according to the majority of people and institutions using the term.
He explains further:
G. K. Chesterton,
the English author who strongly influenced the life and writing of C.S.
Lewis, once said, "Tolerance is a virtue of a man without convictions." This
statement alludes to one of the dire consequence of the new tolerance: the
loss of conviction. In order for a person to possess convictions about a
belief, it is necessary, by definition, for the person to be convinced that
his or her belief is true. But if I sincerely consider everyone's beliefs,
lifestyles, and truth claims as equal to my own (even when they contradict
my beliefs, lifestyles, and truth claims), I can no longer claim any genuine
conviction regarding my own beliefs.
The new tolerance requires me to admit that I may just as
easily be as mistaken or misled as my neighbor. If no truth is "more true"
than any other "truth," then there is no truth worth defending. And if there
is no truth worth defending, there is no room for conviction (emphasis
added).
So it is from our
conviction of the truth of God's Word, we seek to contend for the
faith that was once for all entrusted to the saints (Jude 1:3).
As noted in the
presentation on the NIC VOICE
web site, the following are questions we all need to consider:
•
Is the Bible
true? Does it represent a mythological or symbolic view of spiritual
truths, or it the revelation of God fulfilled in Jesus Christ, based on
historical facts that speak to spiritual truths?
•
Who is
Jesus? Was he a human, like anyone else, who became God through a
“confluence”, or was he God Incarnate, Emmanuel, God with Us?
•
Why did Jesus
come? To make the world a better place in this life? To found a religion?
To teach us to love? What was the ultimate purpose? Was it to reconcile
sinful men to a holy God because he so loved us?
•
Is the “How”
important?
•
Why should we
believe the Bible at all?
•
Why not
believe other religions? Isn’t everyone saved through their faith in their
religion?
Q.
(With regard to the Gospel of John and Jesus’ divinity) Absolute truth??
Absolutely not!! Sorry, it just doesn't wash.
A. The
question of the Authority of Scripture is an area that needs to be addressed
in the UMC.
Article V – Of
the Sufficiency of the Holy Scriptures for Salvation (Book of Discipline)
states:
“In the name of
the Holy Scripture we do understand those canonical books of the Old and New
Testament of whose authority was never any doubt in the church.”
The
United Methodist Church affirms in Article V that the Old and New Testament
Books of the bible are authoritative and accepted by the Church. The church
has ruled by placing into our canon the books of the Old and New Testament
that the writings are inspired by God. God speaks
through His people. The writings that were determined to be Scripture are
the words of God and “canonized”. Therefore, the
Book of John is believed to be written by the inspiration of God. Christians
believe that the author of the book of John did not put words into Jesus’
mouth, but recorded them for posterity. The final verses of the book of
John say this: “This is the disciple who testifies to these things and
who wrote them down. We know that his testimony is true. Jesus did many
other things as well. If every one of them were written down, I suppose
that even the whole world would not have room for the books that would be
written.”
Christians
believe what is written in the Holy Bible and place themselves willingly
under its Authority. The Book of Discipline says in Article V: “The Holy
Scripture containeth all things necessary to
salvation.” Those who wish salvation will find it in the passages of
Scripture, which tell us what we must do to be saved. Scripture testifies
to us Who God Is (Father/Son/Holy Spirit) and how He offers us salvation in
and through the Son, Jesus Christ.
We hope that
you will explore more about the authority of Scripture and Truth. You may
also find the following information helpful as you explore "Absolute Truth":
Honest Answers
to Tough Questions
How Do You Spell Truth?
M-A-P-S to Guide You through Biblical Reliability
Q.
"'NIC' presumably
stands for Northern Illinois Conference. If you are not officially related
to the conference, you should clearly indicate this."
A.
The following is posted prominently on the home page:
NIC (Northern
Illinois
Conference)
VOICE,
a growing network of concerned laity whose purpose is to provide balanced
information and dialog within The United Methodist Church.
NIC VOICE
is not an official publication of the Northern
Illinois Conference or the
United
Methodist Church.
We also stated
that we are not "official" in the article in the United Methodist
Reporter.
Q.
[I] "still do not understand why your website does not do in a "Who Are We"
section what is customary in practically all other organizational websites:
name your officers, provide brief biographical sketches, identify your
sponsors, and clearly identify your origins."
NIC VOICE
is a laity led network, and as such, is not officially affiliated with
our conference, the UMC, or any other group. Participating individuals
may be aware of the national organizations that are active in renewal and
reform, but surprisingly enough, we find that many are not aware of these
efforts. We do not receive funding from any of these national groups.
So:
1. We
have no named officers -- we have volunteers to present the presentation
that is on the web site and to consult with for content. When a volunteer
is assigned to a presentation, information is provided.
2. We
are a network -- we have no "sponsors" other than individuals who choose to
donate for the minimal costs we have to run the web site and produce
literature. We do have a volunteer who helps us with the treasury function
and a web site editor.
3. We
are growing -- anyone who affirms our mission and the Apostle's Creed
and wants to become part of the network to communicate with other laity can
do so.
4. We
are not a reform or renewal group with an ongoing strategic plan.
5. If
you are not from our conference you would probably not know any of us. We
are simply laity. Some of us are lay members to our annual conference, and
some are not. Some choose privacy, and we honor that. Some of us are more
visible.
Our
stated goal is to provide resources that can be used independently of any of
us throughout the
US.
If you are in the Northern Illinois Conference and would like to talk with
one of us in more detail about scheduling a presentation, we would be happy
to do so. We are not available to offer our resources to travel outside the
conference, so the web site is a free resource to others who would like to
learn more.
Volunteers of the NIC VOICE
network agree that they affirm Biblical Christianity as stated in the
Apostle's Creed, the Bible, and the UMC Book of Discipline, Articles of
Faith. We do not claim any personal authority but the authority of the
Scriptures themselves.
As
such, we have not sought to highlight ourselves or our backgrounds. Some of
us are lay members of our annual conference and one was recently elected as
an alternate to jurisdictional at our Annual Conference. What unites us
all, however, is the bond of unity in a saving, personal relationship with
Christ through faith and a desire to express this within the Northern
Illinois Conference.
Our
origins are this:
The genesis of NIC VOICE was discussion among a
small group of family and UMC laity regarding Bishop Sprague's Illiff
Seminary speech and later publication of Chapter 4 of his book,
Affirmations of a Dissenter, on the Northern Illinois Conference
website, along with articles published in the The United Methodist
Reporter. We soon realized that many of our friends felt the same way
we did about the progressive interpretation of the Bible and the Book of
Discipline.
Some of us emailed Bishop Sprague explaining our concerns about his symbolic
and metaphorical theological approach. He confirmed that he took a
different approach to theology. Then we began researching opinions about
the Bishop's speeches and his book, including what other bishops had to say.
In addition, we began to study and gather Biblical references that speak
directly to these doctrines. We also researched the Book of Discipline (BOD)
and our UMC Statement of Faith for applicable references.
We continue feeling the leadership of the Holy Spirit to help inform and
have dialogue with the laity of the Northern Illinois Conference about the
core issues underlying the complaint and its subsequent dismissal. It was
decided the best way to present the results of our research was to develop a
presentation that we elected to call, NIC VOICE Watershed Moment.
It was designed so that we can share it with laity of NIC churches
desiring dialog about what Bishop Ough's Supervisory Team calls a
Watershed Moment. NIC VOICE,
along with a large percentage of UM laity, share in common the
affirmation of traditional, orthodox, literal interpretation of the
Apostle's Creed.
<<back
Recently,
NIC VOICE
was asked a serious of questions about Bishop Sprague's retirement and the
future. These questions and
NIC VOICE's
answers follow and are now also
included in the NIC
VOICE
FAQ:
Q: Bishop
Sprague is set to retire later in 2004. What is
NIC VOICE's observations about his retiring?
Bishop Sprague's
episcopal tenure in Northern Illinois was largely overshadowed by issues
of homosexual practice and same-sex covenants brought into sharp focus
during the trial of Rev. Gregory Dell and by issues of theology as
expressed in his book, "Affirmations of a Dissenter". The Bishop's
advocacy in both of these cases put him at odds with the ethics and
theology of the majority of United Methodists, as expressed by the actions
of General Conference and the Book of Discipline. Unfortunately, this has
led the Northern Illinois Conference, and its delegation to the upcoming
General and Jurisdictional Conferences, into a somewhat adversarial
relationship with the rest of the church. This is deeply troubling to many
of us.
Evidence of the result
of this leadership is reflected in the passage in the June 2003 Northern
Illinois Annual Conference of
Resolution 700-23 Reflecting the Love of God by 56%
of those clergy and laity who voted. This resolution instructs and
encourages local NIC churches to proclaim teachings that directly
contradict the Book of Discipline and call upon the General Conference to
pass this resolution so that this conference’s views would change the
historically accepted apostolic doctrines of the UMC.
Sadly, during Bishop Sprague's tenure the Northern Illinois Conference has
continued to lose members, is experiencing extreme financial difficulty,
and, with the exception of issues related to casino gambling expansion,
has lost influence, and competence to lead in the twenty-first century.
In a Charge Conference
report, one pastor’s musings reflects what many pastors feel – that this
has been a year of “dissention, turmoil, bewilderment, and anger”
regarding Bishop Sprague’s theological teaching and the passage of
Resolution 700-23. While many members simply slip quietly away, some
communicate that they no longer desire to be part of to a denomination
that refuses to uphold its own doctrinal standards.
Bishop Sprague does not intend to just fade away quietly into the night.
He will continue to use his influence within the Northern Illinois
Conference, make addresses at events and
speak out on every occasion he is given. We know
that his imprint overshadows a wide-ranging sphere of influence.
<<back
Q: What will the
Northern Illinois Conference gain/lose by his retirement?
The events of the last
year have placed the NIC at the crossroads of time – this has been our
Watershed Moment. In the face of such challenges, the response has been
muted; in the clergy, by fear of repercussions and in the laity by
disinterest, apathy, lack of understanding of Methodist theology and lack
of knowledge. Only time will tell if God has removed His hand from the
UMC in general and the NIC in particular. Prayer is the only key that will
unlock this door.
Many pastors feel that
they do not know what the future holds and determine that they will focus
on the ministry in their own church. Some laity and clergy have simply
“dropped out” of the Annual Conference, not participating at all. Perhaps
a new bishop can encourage the return of many who feel that they would
rather not be a part of the NIC.
The retirement of Bishop
Sprague, and some of his colleagues in the Council of Bishops, clears the
way for the possible election and assignment of visionary episcopal
leaders who are grounded in the apostolic, ecumenical faith, relevant to
the spiritual seeking of the current generation
<<back
Q: Is
NIC VOICE doing anything to
influence who is named his replacement?
NIC VOICE
remains focused
on our key objectives to reach out and provide a forum for education. The
NIC VOICE
website at,
www.nicvoice.org
is the primary vehicle, along with presentations in churches in the
conference. We hope that through this process, laity will become more
involved in the conference in the coming years.
In addition,
NIC VOICE was
invited to speak at the
Forum for
Evangelical Theology at Garrett-Evangelical Theological Seminary in
October 2003. The topic of the presentation was
“Contending for the
Faith." We believe that one of the essential elements for education
is to reach out to the seminaries to help them understand how laity feel
about the theological issues within the UMC.
We have submitted 25 petitions and resolutions for consideration at
the General Conference of 2004. These will add our voice to those of
similar content that have been or will be submitted by other conservative
factions within the UMC.
With regard to this
upcoming election of a new bishop, our primary attempts to influence the
election and assignment of bishops are made through prayer. We long for
the day when Bishops are in partnership with the laity and clergy of their
annual conferences and focused on the mission of making disciples of Jesus
Christ.
The Northern Illinois Conference Evangelical Association (NICEA) was
established five years ago to provide a forum to uphold “The Centrality of
the Bible, Upholding Our Doctrinal Standards, and our engagement in the
world through UMC Social Principles”. We have communicated to NICEA the
thoughts and feelings of concerned laity and clergy (some of these are
posted at the Comments section of our website, but many others are
personal reflections from both clergy and laity), and this group will be
speaking directly to the NIC Jurisdictional Delegation, and is
additionally studying actions that could be taken to be influential in the
overall North Central Jurisdiction election process.
<<back
Q:
What is the status of the
recommendations of the response team that dismissed the complaint against
Bishop Sprague?
NIC (Northern Illinois Conference) VOICE
recently reached out to all active bishops requesting a response regarding
the implementation of recommendations made by the response team in the
dismissal of the complaint against Bishop Sprague.
The letters were mailed to each
bishop on September 5, 2003 and included 51 authorized signatures by both
laity and clergy within the Northern Illinois Conference and other
conferences throughout the United States. Click here to read the full text
of the letter:
NIC VOICE Letter of Concern to all
Active Bishops.
Click here to read three
bishops responses:
Response to NIC VOICE September 5,
2003 Letter to All Active Bishops, including Bishops
Keaton, Weaver and President of the Council of Bishops,
Bishop Ruediger R. Minor.
Click here to read
NIC VOICE
response to Bishop Keaton and Bishop Weaver:
NIC VOICE
Response to NIC VOICE September 5, 2003
Letter to All Active Bishops
From the response to Bishop Keaton:
…In your letter,
you indicated we should direct our inquiry regarding Response Team
recommendation #1 to Bishop Sprague. He did receive our letter, and as of
this date has not responded (he has been on renewal leave until October 1).
We agree with your
suggestion that Question # 2 be directed to the Council of Bishops
President, who also was sent our letter by mail and email and as of this
date has not responded…
From the response to Bishop Weaver:
…In your letter, you indicated that the North Central Jurisdiction has
the responsibility to monitor, and select a third party to facilitate
dialogue between the parties concerning the theological and doctrinal issues
presented in this case. We are not aware of any steps by the Jurisdiction
to ensure that this Response Team recommendation is implemented.
We are encouraged that you have indicated the Council of Bishops is
already exploring and planning many things connected to the second
recommendation of the Response Team. We anticipate such future positive
actions and responses as a result of actions by both individual Bishops and
the Council as a whole….
To date, even after the
Council met earlier this month, there has been no action on Response Team
Recommendations 1 & 2 that has been communicated to the church.
In Bishop Minor’s response,
he notes that, “It seems to me that you see the Council of Bishops ‘in
charge’ of the further process of the Response Team's recommendations.
However, dealing with complaints against a bishop falls in the
responsibility of such bishop's Jurisdictional College and Committee on
Episcopacy.” He further recommended that, “to receive an answer to your
first two questions, you should address them to the North Central
Jurisdiction.” Both Bishops Ough and Bishop Lee, who chaired the North
Central Jurisdictional response team in the Bishop Sprague complaint,
received NIC VOICE’s
letter. Neither has provided an update.
Regarding Response Team
Recommendation 2, Bishop Minor continued, “… I can inform you that the
Council of Bishops' Standing Committee on Teaching Concerns is working on a
proposal, how the intent of this recommendation could best be fulfilled. In
the meantime, several persons from this Committee as well as from the wider
Council have come forward with personal contributions to these around
Christology and the mission of the Church.”
We intend to remain
involved, making certain that the response team’s recommendations are acted
upon in a timely manner. The laity and clergy are watching to see if these
matters are a priority to the Council of Bishops.
If we really believe that
faith in Jesus Christ, our Lord and Savior, who is God Incarnate and died to
atone for our sins, determines whether a person spends eternity in heaven or
hell, then we must be compelled to boldly proclaim this truth in love, and
to call our Conference and the UMC to uphold our doctrinal standards. God
will hold us accountable for the gospel He has entrusted to us.
<<back
<<back
|